Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition dated January 9, 1990, is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the order of disposition dated June 5, 1989, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Since the appellant did not move to suppress any physical evidence seized by the police at the time of his arrest, his appellate claim that such evidence should have been suppressed has been waived (see, Family Ct Act § 330.2; cf., Matter of George V., 100 A.D.2d 594). Contrary to the appellant's request, under the circumstances herein, we decline to hold that the probable cause hearing was, in fact, a suppression hearing (see, Matter of Robert G., 121 Misc.2d 680, 691-692; see also, Matter of Oniel W., 146 A.D.2d 633, 634; People v. Reed, 98 Misc.2d 488, 489-490; People ex rel. Pierce v. Thomas, 70 Misc.2d 629). Lawrence, J.P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and O'Brien, JJ., concur.