DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff and the defendant were married on September 21, 1990. On December 5, 2001, they executed a stipulation of settlement subsequent to the commencement of an action for a divorce (hereinafter the stipulation). On December 12, 2002, the defendant moved, inter alia, to set aside the stipulation. The Supreme Court denied the motion and the defendant appeals.
A stipulation of settlement which is fair on its face will not be set aside absent fraud, duress, overreaching, or unconscionability ( see Christian v. Christian, 42 N.Y.2d 63; Strangolagalli v. Strangolagalli, 295 A.D.2d 338). Here, the defendant failed to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate any grounds to set aside the stipulation. Thus, his motion was properly denied.
The defendant's contention that the stipulation should have been set aside because of the plaintiff's noncompliance with her obligations under the stipulation is without evidentiary support.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.