Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People's remarks on summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant either failed to object to the remarks, made only a general objection, or moved belatedly for a mistrial ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Malave, 7 AD3d 542; People v. White, 5 AD3d 511; People v. Williams [Sean], 305 AD2d 703; People v. Jones, 294 AD2d 517). In any event, the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissive rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel's summation ( see People v. Filipe, 7 AD3d 539; cf. People v. Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105).