DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the admission of testimony regarding his and the complainant's membership in a gang, of which the defendant was the leader, is without merit. This evidence was relevant on the issue of the defendant's motive, and was necessary background to explain the relationship between the defendant and the complainant ( see People v. Newby, 291 A.D.2d 460). Since the probative value of this testimony outweighed any prejudice to the defendant, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in admitting it ( id.; see also People v. Carroll, 95 N.Y.2d 375, 385).
The defendant contends that the prosecutor's references to this testimony during summation constituted reversible error. The defendant failed to preserve this argument for appellate review, as he failed to object during the prosecutor's summation ( see CPL 470.05; see also People v. Williams, 305 A.D.2d 703). In any event, the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissive rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel's summation ( see People v. Hoover, 298 A.D.2d 599; see also People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Hines, 3 A.D.3d 580).
SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.