The appeal has been rendered moot because petitioner appeared before the Parole Board in August 2005 and received another hearing ( Matter of Siao-Pao v. Travis, 5 AD3d 150, lv denied 3 NY3d 603). In any event, we find that respondent properly considered the factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i, including such pertinent documents as the presentence report and victim impact statement.