AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE LEOPOLD SIAO-PAO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRION D. TRAVIS, ETC., Respondent-Respondent.

The appeal is moot because petitioner appeared before the Parole Board in 2003 and received another hearing, the only relief that petitioner could have received in the event that this Court found merit in his current appeal concerning his denial of parole in 2001 ( see Matter of King v. New York State Division of Parole, 83 N.Y.2d 788; Matter of Patterson v. New York State Division of Parole, 298 A.D.2d 254, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 501). In any event, we find that the Board properly considered the factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF SIAO-PAO v. TRAVIS
(Mar 4, 2004)