AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICARDO S. FISHER, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender, and thus it will not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595). There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level ( see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FISHER
(Jan 30, 2007)