AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent, v. DESHAWN BROWN, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the hearing court properly relied on his testimony and his admissions to the prison drug treatment providers in classifying him as a level two sex offender. Correction Law § 168-n(3) specifically authorizes a hearing court to utilize reliable hearsay evidence in reaching its determination ( see People v. Myers, 306 A.D.2d 334). The Supreme Court's determination was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore will not be disturbed on appeal.

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWN
(May 10, 2004)