AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

CHANTAL THOMPSON et al., Appellants, v. FOREIGN CARS CENTER, INC., Doing Business as KINGS VOLKSWAGEN, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the motion of the defendants Foreign Cars Center, Inc., doing business as Kings Volkswagen, and Mickey Gilbert, individually and as an officer of Foreign Cars Center, Inc., which were for summary judgment dismissing the third, fourth, fifth, and seventh causes of action insofar as asserted against them are denied.

As noted by the plaintiffs in their submissions to the Supreme Court, the defendants Foreign Cars Center, Inc., doing business as Kings Volkswagen, and Mickey Gilbert, individually and as an officer of Foreign Cars Center, Inc. (hereinafter the defendants), failed to include a complete set of the pleadings in support of their motion for summary judgment, as required by CPLR 3212 (b). Accordingly, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, and the denial of those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the third, fourth, fifth, and seventh causes of action insofar as asserted against them was required ( see Matsyuk v Konkalipos, 35 AD3d 675; Wider v Heller, 24 AD3d 433, 434; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663; Lawlor v County of Nassau, 166 AD2d 692).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs' remaining contentions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMPSON v. FOREIGN
(May 22, 2007)