AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GALINA MATSYUK, Respondent, v. KONSTANTIN KONKALIPOS et al., Respondents, and TATYANA TSIPENYUK, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment because the papers she submitted in support of her motion failed to include copies of all of the pleadings in the action as required by CPLR 3212 (b) ( see Wider v Heller, 24 AD3d 433; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663; Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283; Deer Park Assoc. v Robbins Store, 243 AD2d 443; Lawlor v County of Nassau, 166 AD2d 692).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATSYUK v. TSIPENYUK
(Dec 19, 2006)