Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The County Court properly denied the defendant's motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had the DNA test results been admitted into evidence at trial ( see CPL 440.30 [1-a]; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 961, 962; People v Bailey, 35 AD3d 491, 492, lv denied 8 NY3d 943; People v Mattocks, 15 AD3d 676, 677; People v Rispoli, 1 AD3d 538, 539).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.