AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOHN RISPOLI, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a) for forensic DNA testing on certain evidence recovered from the victim. The defendant failed to show that if the specified evidence was tested and the test results admitted into evidence, "there exists a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to [him]" ( see CPL 440.30[1-a]; People v. McCloud, 303 A.D.2d 604, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 584; People v. McDonald, 298 A.D.2d 466; People v. Perry, 295 A.D.2d 452).

SMITH, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RISPOLI
(Nov 17, 2003)