AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD LAURIA, Appellant, v. TERESA USAK-LAURIA, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the wife's motion which was for an award of an interim counsel fee in the sum of $25,000 in light of the disparity in the parties' relative financial positions and the husband's conduct, which resulted in unnecessary motion practice ( see Meltzer v Meltzer, 63 AD3d 702; Davis-Potente v Potente, 60 AD3d 720, 721; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61, 66; McGarrity v McGarrity, 49 AD3d 824, 826).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EDWARD LAURIA v. TERESA USAK-LAURIA
(Sep 8, 2009)