AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LAURIE ANN DAVIS-POTENTE, Appellant, v. SAVERIO P. POTENTE, Respondent. LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL I. MARNELL, P.C., Nonparty Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal of the Law Offices of Russell I. Marnell, P.C., from the order dated October 1, 2007, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the money judgment dated November 7, 2007 ( see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the money judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the nonparty Russell I. Marnell, P.C.; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent payable by the nonparty appellant.

Contrary to the contention of the nonparty appellant, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding an interim attorney's fee in the sum of only $10,000 ( see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; O'Shea v O'Shea, 93 NY2d 187; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61; Silver v Silver, 46 AD3d 667; Salerno v Salerno, 142 AD2d 670). The amount was sufficient to ensure that the nonmonied wife was able to litigate the action on equal footing with the monied husband ( see O'Shea v O'Shea, 93 NY2d 187; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61).

The nonparty appellant's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS-POTENTE v. POTENTE
(Mar 10, 2009)