AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of TROY McCULLOUGH, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Ser

While being escorted from a disciplinary hearing, petitioner struck a correction officer in the face. The officer attempted to restrain petitioner, but petitioner resisted and disregarded the officer's orders to stop. Petitioner was ultimately subdued and handcuffs were applied. He was later charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, disturbing the order of the facility and refusing a direct order. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Initially, insofar as petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the documentary evidence and testimony of the correction officers present at the scene, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Terrence v Fischer, 64 AD3d 1110; Matter of Dozier v Selsky, 54 AD3d 1074, 1075). Petitioner's assertion that he did not assault the correction officer, but that the officer assaulted him presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Peana v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1126, 1127; Matter of Martinez v Selsky, 53 AD3d 989). Petitioner further contends that he was improperly denied certain documentary evidence detailing the nature of the officer's injuries. Although petitioner was denied photographs of the officer's injuries and was given redacted copies of the use of force report, the Hearing Officer reported on the record the injury sustained by the officer, which consisted of an abrasion to his right cheek. In view of this, the officer's injury was sufficiently established and, given the overwhelming evidence of petitioner's guilt, any error was harmless ( see Matter of Melendez v Goord, 288 AD2d 791, 793; see e.g. Matter of Cody v Goord, 17 AD3d 943, 944). Petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE McCULLOUGH
(Nov 12, 2009)