AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JAMES WATSON, Appellant, v. BRIAN S. FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Ser

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a determination finding that he had performed a sex act and failed to comply with visitation procedures. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner appealed. The Attorney General advises us that, during the pendency of this appeal, the determination at issue was administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Petitioner has thus received all the relief to which he is entitled and the appeal is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Mercer v Artus, 70 AD3d 1073, 1073-1074; Matter of Hinds v Venettozzi, 64 AD3d 1095, 1095-1096).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE JAMES WATSON
(May 13, 2010)