AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of CURTIS HINDS, Appellant, v. D. VENETTOZZI, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of a false alarm. The Attorney General advises this Court that the administrative determination at issue has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this matter is therefore dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Hart v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1226; Matter of York v Fischer, 55 AD3d 1096).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HINDS v. VENETTOZZI
(Jul 30, 2009)