AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY FAVALE, Appellant.

Ordered that the amended sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

While the defendant's contention that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), we consider the matter in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v Fusillo, 94 AD2d 802). The sentencing court adjudicated the defendant a second felony offender ( see Penal Law § 70.06) absent any indication of compliance with the procedural requirements of CPL 400.21, or any showing that the defendant was given notice and an opportunity to be heard ( see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140; People v Alston, 289 AD2d 339). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing ( see People v Hamdam, 58 AD3d 752).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FAVALE
(Oct 26, 2010)