Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Supreme Court properly permitted a prosecution witness to testify regarding defense counsel's presence at the lineup observed by the robbery victim and counsel's statements indicating that he was satisfied with the composition of the lineup ( see People v Foulks, 143 AD2d 1038).
The defendant's present contentions regarding suppression of evidence of the showup identification made by the burglary victim are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Foster, 187 AD2d 401). In any event, the hearing testimony supports the hearing court's determination that the identification was sufficiently reliable to submit to the jury ( see People v Marte, 52 AD3d 737; People v Darnell, 146 AD2d 583; People v Blackman, 110 AD2d 596). The evidence at the hearing also shows an independent source for the burglary victim's in-court identification of the defendant ( see People v Wilson, 5 NY3d 778, 780; People v Golliver, 132 AD2d 618).
The defendant's trial attorney provided meaningful representation ( see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).
While the defendant's contention that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), we consider the matter in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v Fusillo, 94 AD2d 802). The sentencing court adjudicated the defendant a second felony offender ( see Penal Law § 70.06) absent any indication of compliance with the procedural requirements of CPL 400.21, or any showing that the defendant was given notice and an opportunity to be heard ( cf. People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140; People v Alston, 289 AD2d 339). We therefore remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance with the mandates of CPL 400.21.