Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Act 5 of 2009
  • Section 357-A
  • Poisons Act, 1919
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Act 5 of 2009
  • Section 357-A
  • Poisons Act, 1919
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

On 6-2-2013 the Supreme Court of India directed the Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, along with the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers, to convene a meeting with Chief Secretaries/Administrators of all States and Union Territories to discuss: (i) regulation of acid sale, (ii) treatment and rehabilitation of acid-attack victims, and (iii) compensation mechanisms for such victims. Subsequent orders were passed on 16-4-2013, 9-7-2013 and 16-7-2013. In response, various States/UTs and the Union of India filed affidavits. The Union Government’s affidavit dated 17-7-2013 enclosed draft “Poisons Possession and Sale Rules, 2013” (Model Rules). The present order records the status of compliance and issues further directions.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether States and Union Territories must frame or amend rules, in line with the Central Government’s Model Rules, to effectively regulate the sale and possession of acid and other corrosive substances.
  2. What interim regulatory measures should operate in jurisdictions where such rules are not yet in force.
  3. The appropriate quantum of compensation to be paid by States/UTs to victims of acid attacks under the Victim Compensation Scheme envisaged by Section 357-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
  4. Whether offences under the Poisons Act, 1919 should be made cognizable and non-bailable.

Arguments of the Parties

Union of India (Solicitor General)

  • Undertook to circulate the Model Rules to all States/UTs within one week, covering licensing, permissible forms and concentrations of acid, and categories of permissible purchasers.
  • Suggested that compensation for acid-attack victims be uniformly set at a minimum of ₹3,00,000, considering the high cost of medical care and rehabilitation.

State of Tamil Nadu

  • Through counsel, assured the Court that rules to regulate sale of acid and corrosive substances would be framed within two months.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Orders dated 16-4-2013, 9-7-2013 and 16-7-2013 in Laxmi v. Union of India, (2014) 4 SCC 431 Earlier interim directions on regulation of acid sale and victim rehabilitation Current order builds upon and enforces compliance with these earlier directions.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court noted varied levels of compliance among States/UTs: some had framed rules, others had only drafts, and many had none. Recognising the need for uniform and stringent control, the Court accepted the Solicitor General’s undertaking to circulate Model Rules and held that:

  • States/UTs without rules must adopt the Model Rules within three months; those with less stringent rules must amend them accordingly.
  • Until such rules become operational, specific interim safeguards—maintenance of sales registers, age restrictions, declaration of stock to Sub-Divisional Magistrates (SDMs), identity verification of purchasers, and penalties up to ₹50,000—shall apply immediately.
  • Institutions legitimately handling acid must maintain usage registers, designate a responsible custodian, and implement supervised storage and exit checks.
  • SDMs are empowered to enforce the interim directions, including confiscation of undeclared stock and imposition of fines.
  • Inconsistency in Victim Compensation Schemes violates the rehabilitative intent of Section 357-A CrPC; therefore a uniform minimum of ₹3,00,000 is necessary, split into ₹1,00,000 within 15 days of the incident and the remaining ₹2,00,000 within two months.
  • The Court also urged that offences under the Poisons Act, 1919 be rendered cognizable and non-bailable to strengthen enforcement.

Holding and Implications

The Court issued mandatory directions requiring all States and Union Territories to:

  • Adopt or align their rules on acid sale with the Central Government’s Model Rules within three months.
  • Implement specified interim controls on retail sale and institutional handling of acid, enforceable by SDMs.
  • Ensure acid-attack victims receive a minimum compensation of ₹3,00,000 as outlined, with strict timelines for disbursement.
  • Translate and publicise the order in vernacular languages and pursue making Poisons Act offences cognizable and non-bailable.

Immediate implications include uniform nationwide regulation of acid sale, enhanced deterrence through stricter enforcement, and substantial, time-bound financial support for victims. The order primarily affects executive compliance and does not create a new jurisprudential precedent beyond reinforcing the State’s duty under Section 357-A CrPC.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Laxmi v. Union Of India And Others

    Order

    1. On 6-2-2013, a direction was given to the Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs associating the Secretary, Ministry of Chemical and Fertilisers to convene a meeting of the Chief Secretaries/Secretaries concerned of the State Governments and the Administrators of the Union Territories, inter alia, to discuss the following aspects:

    1.1 Enactment of appropriate provision for effective regulation of sale of acid in the States/Union Territories.

    1.2 Measures for the proper treatment, aftercare and rehabilitation of the victims of acid attack and needs of acid attack victims.

    1.3 Compensation payable to acid attack victims by the State/or creation of some separate fund for payment of compensation to the acid attack victims.

    2. Following the order of 6-2-2013, three subsequent orders on 16-4-2013 (2014) 4 SCC 431, 9-7-2013 (2014) 4 SCC 431 and 16-7-2013 (2014) 4 SCC 431 were passed by this Court.

    3. Various State Governments/Union Territories have filed their affidavits. The Union of India filed its last affidavit on 17-7-2013. Along with that affidavit, draft Model Rules entitled “the Poisons Possession and Sale Rules, 2013” (for short “the Model Rules”) have been placed on record.

    4. Mr Mohan Parasaran, learned Solicitor General states that the Central Government will circulate the Model Rules to regulate sale of acid and other corrosive substances framed under the Poisons Act, 1919 to all the State Governments and Union Territories within a week from today. He also states that the Model Rules will include, inter alia, the form of acids (liquids or crystalline and its concentration) that can be stored and sold, issue of licences, procurement by individuals, educational and research institutions, hospitals, industries, government departments and departments of public sector undertakings. We accept the statement made by the learned Solicitor General as noted above.

    5. Insofar as the States and Union Territories are concerned, we are informed that the States of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Kerala, Haryana, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh have framed rules to regulate sale of acid and other corrosive substances. As regards the State of Meghalaya, we find from the available record that draft Rules have been prepared, a copy of which has been made available to the Court.

    6. The learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu has stated before us that within two months from today, appropriate rules to regularise sale of acid and other corrosive substances shall be framed.

    7. In our opinion, all the States and Union Territories which have not yet framed rules will do well to make rules to regulate sale of acid and other corrosive substances in line with the Model Rules framed by the Central Government. The States, which have framed rules but these rules are not as stringent as the Model Rules framed by the Central Government will make necessary amendments in their rules to bring them in line with the Model Rules. The Chief Secretaries of the respective States and the Administrators of the Union Territories shall ensure compliance with the above expeditiously and in no case later than three months from the receipt of the draft Model Rules from the Central Government.

    8. The Centre and States/Union Territories shall work towards making the offences under the Poisons Act, 1919 cognizable and non-bailable.

    9. In the States/Union Territories, where rules to regulate sale of acid and other corrosive substances are not operational, until such rules are framed and made operational, the Chief Secretaries of the States concerned/Administrators of the Union Territories shall ensure the compliance with the following directions with immediate effect:

    9.1 Over the counter, sale of acid is completely prohibited unless the seller maintains a log/register recording the sale of acid which will contain the details of the person(s) to whom acid(s) is/are sold and the quantity sold. The log/register shall contain the address of the person to whom it is sold.

    9.2 All sellers shall sell acid only after the buyer has shown:

    (a) a photo ID issued by the Government which also has the address of the person;
    (b) specifies the reason/purpose for procuring acid.

    9.3 All stocks of acid must be declared by the seller with the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) concerned within 15 days.

    9.4 No acid shall be sold to any person who is below 18 years of age.

    9.5 In case of undeclared stock of acid, it will be open to the SDM concerned to confiscate the stock and suitably impose a fine on such seller up to Rs 50,000.

    9.6 The SDM concerned may impose fine up to Rs 50,000 on any person who commits breach of any of the above directions.

    10. Educational institutions, research laboratories, hospitals, government departments and the departments of public sector undertakings, who are required to keep and store acid, shall follow the following guidelines:

    10.1 A register of usage of acid shall be maintained and the same shall be filed with the SDM concerned.

    10.2 A person shall be made accountable for possession and safe keeping of acid in their premises.

    10.3 The acid shall be stored under the supervision of this person and there shall be compulsory checking of the students/personnel leaving the laboratories/place of storage where acid is used.

    11. The SDM concerned shall be vested with the responsibility of taking appropriate action for the breach/default/violation of the above directions.

    12. Section 357-A came to be inserted in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by Act 5 of 2009 w.e.f 31-12-2009. Inter alia, this section provides for preparation of a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependants who have suffered loss or injury as a result of the crime and who require rehabilitation.

    13. We are informed that pursuant to this provision, 17 States and 7 Union Territories have prepared “Victim Compensation Scheme” (for short “the Scheme”). As regards the victims of acid attacks, the compensation mentioned in the Scheme framed by these States and Union Territories is un-uniform. While the State of Bihar has provided for compensation of Rs 25,000 in such Scheme, the State of Rajasthan has provided for Rs 2 lakhs of compensation. In our view, the compensation provided in the Scheme by most of the States/Union Territories is inadequate. It cannot be overlooked that acid attack victims need to undergo a series of plastic surgeries and other corrective treatments. Having regard to this problem, the learned Solicitor General suggested to us that the compensation by the States/Union Territories for acid attack victims must be enhanced to at least Rs 3 lakhs as the aftercare and rehabilitation cost. The suggestion of the learned Solicitor General is very fair.

    14. We, accordingly, direct that the acid attack victims shall be paid compensation of at least Rs 3 lakhs by the State Government/Union Territory concerned as the aftercare and rehabilitation cost. Of this amount, a sum of Rs 1 lakh shall be paid to such victim within 15 days of occurrence of such incident (or being brought to the notice of the State Government/Union Territory) to facilitate immediate medical attention and expenses in this regard. The balance sum of Rs 2 lakhs shall be paid as expeditiously as may be possible and positively within two months thereafter. The Chief Secretaries of the States and the Administrators of the Union Territories shall ensure compliance with the above direction.

    15. The Chief Secretaries of the States and the Administrators of the Union Territories shall take necessary steps in getting this order translated into vernacular and publicise the same appropriately for the information of public at large. List the matter on 3-12-2013.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Laxmi v. Union Of India And Others
    (Jul 18, 2013)