Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Bell v. Leavenworth: Post-Egbert Foreclosure of Bivens First-Amendment Claims and the Futility of FTCA Amendments Without Physical Injury

Bell v. Leavenworth: Post-Egbert Foreclosure of Bivens First-Amendment Claims and the Futility of FTCA Amendments Without Physical Injury

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Bell v. Leavenworth: Post-Egbert Foreclosure of Bivens First-Amendment Claims and the Futility of FTCA Amendments Without Physical Injury Introduction Orlando Bell, a federal prisoner once housed at...
Tenth Circuit Reinforces the “Rediscovered-Memory” Sham-Affidavit Doctrine: Commentary on Gabaldon v. New Mexico State Police (2025)

Tenth Circuit Reinforces the “Rediscovered-Memory” Sham-Affidavit Doctrine: Commentary on Gabaldon v. New Mexico State Police (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Tenth Circuit Reinforces the “Rediscovered-Memory” Sham-Affidavit Doctrine: A Detailed Commentary on Gabaldon v. New Mexico State Police (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Case name: Craig Gabaldon v....
P.W. v. Commissioner, SSA: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Use of Pre-2017 Medical-Opinion Rules and Re-Affirms the “Substantial Evidence” Deference in Social Security Appeals

P.W. v. Commissioner, SSA: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Use of Pre-2017 Medical-Opinion Rules and Re-Affirms the “Substantial Evidence” Deference in Social Security Appeals

Date: Jun 18, 2025
P.W. v. Commissioner, SSA: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Use of Pre-2017 Medical-Opinion Rules and Re-Affirms the “Substantial Evidence” Deference in Social Security Appeals 1. Introduction P.W. v....
California § 245(a)(2) Assault Not a “Crime of Violence”: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Sjodin (10th Cir. 2025)

California § 245(a)(2) Assault Not a “Crime of Violence”: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Sjodin (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
California § 245(a)(2) Assault Not a “Crime of Violence”: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Sjodin (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Sjodin, No. 23-4069 (10th Cir. 2025),...
Officer Eyewitness Identification as Probable Cause – A Commentary on Samuel Scott, Jr. v. City of Miami (11th Cir. 2025)

Officer Eyewitness Identification as Probable Cause – A Commentary on Samuel Scott, Jr. v. City of Miami (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Officer Eyewitness Identification as Probable Cause: An In-Depth Commentary on Samuel Scott, Jr. v. City of Miami, 23-11280 (11th Cir., 11 June 2025) Introduction In Samuel Scott, Jr. v. City of...
United States v. Elias Chiroy-CAC: Cementing the Presumption of Legislative Good Faith in Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326

United States v. Elias Chiroy-CAC: Cementing the Presumption of Legislative Good Faith in Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326

Date: Jun 18, 2025
United States v. Elias Chiroy-CAC: Cementing the Presumption of Legislative Good Faith in Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 1. Introduction United States v. Elias Chiroy-CAC (11th Cir....
Presumption of Legislative Good-Faith Prevails: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326

Presumption of Legislative Good-Faith Prevails: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Presumption of Legislative Good-Faith Prevails: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Equal-Protection Challenges to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Introduction United States v. Ignacio Felix-Salinas (consolidated with...
Presumption of Legislative Good Faith Reaffirmed: Eleventh Circuit Joins Nationwide Consensus Upholding 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Against Equal-Protection Challenges

Presumption of Legislative Good Faith Reaffirmed: Eleventh Circuit Joins Nationwide Consensus Upholding 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Against Equal-Protection Challenges

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Presumption of Legislative Good Faith Reaffirmed: Eleventh Circuit Joins Nationwide Consensus Upholding 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Against Equal-Protection Challenges Introduction In United States v. Jorge...

        Feazell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.: Tightening the Evidentiary
        & Causation Screws on Eighth-Amendment Deliberate-Indifference
        and Monell Claims Against Private Prison Healthcare Providers

Feazell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.: Tightening the Evidentiary & Causation Screws on Eighth-Amendment Deliberate-Indifference and Monell Claims Against Private Prison Healthcare Providers

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Feazell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Seventh Circuit solidifies standards for: (1) proving a private contractor’s Monell liability, (2) showing a physician’s subjective knowledge in...
Feazell v. Wexford: Seventh Circuit Tightens the Evidentiary Screws — Expert Testimony Required and Monell Causation Re-emphasised

Feazell v. Wexford: Seventh Circuit Tightens the Evidentiary Screws — Expert Testimony Required and Monell Causation Re-emphasised

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Feazell v. Wexford: Seventh Circuit Tightens the Evidentiary Screws — Expert Testimony Required and Monell Causation Re-emphasised 1. Introduction On 11 June 2025, the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarifying the Vagueness Doctrine in Third-Party Notification Conditions of Supervised Release – A Commentary on United States v. Falandis Russell

Clarifying the Vagueness Doctrine in Third-Party Notification Conditions of Supervised Release – A Commentary on United States v. Falandis Russell

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Clarifying the Vagueness Doctrine in Third-Party Notification Conditions of Supervised Release Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Falandis Russell, 7th Cir., June 11 2025 1. Introduction...
Oral Colloquy Cannot Implicitly Amend a Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Sherman Threets (7th Cir. 2025)

Oral Colloquy Cannot Implicitly Amend a Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Sherman Threets (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Oral Colloquy Cannot Implicitly Amend a Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Sherman Threets (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United...
United States v. Russell & Williams: The Seventh Circuit Demands Precision in “Third-Party-Risk” Supervised-Release Conditions and Clarifies Competency-to-Stand-Trial Assessments

United States v. Russell & Williams: The Seventh Circuit Demands Precision in “Third-Party-Risk” Supervised-Release Conditions and Clarifies Competency-to-Stand-Trial Assessments

Date: Jun 18, 2025
United States v. Russell & Williams: The Seventh Circuit Demands Precision in “Third-Party-Risk” Supervised-Release Conditions and Clarifies Competency-to-Stand-Trial Assessments Introduction On...
People v. T.P. (2025) – Counsel’s Affirmative Duty to Quell Prosecutorial Misstatements that Strike at the Core of a Justification Defense

People v. T.P. (2025) – Counsel’s Affirmative Duty to Quell Prosecutorial Misstatements that Strike at the Core of a Justification Defense

Date: Jun 18, 2025
People v. T.P. (2025): Elevating the Standard for Effective Assistance—Defense Counsel Must Object to Prosecutorial Summation Misstatements that Undermine a Justification Defense 1. Introduction...
People v. Brenda WW.: Plenary Appellate Review and Non-Creditable Postrelease Supervision under the DVSJA

People v. Brenda WW.: Plenary Appellate Review and Non-Creditable Postrelease Supervision under the DVSJA

Date: Jun 18, 2025
People v. Brenda WW.: Plenary Appellate Review and Non-Creditable Postrelease Supervision under the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act 1. Introduction In People v. Brenda WW. (2025 NY Slip Op...
Bail as a “Condition of Release” under CPL 510.10 (4)(t): Commentary on People ex rel. Welch v. Maginley-Liddie

Bail as a “Condition of Release” under CPL 510.10 (4)(t): Commentary on People ex rel. Welch v. Maginley-Liddie

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Bail as a “Condition of Release” under CPL 510.10 (4)(t) Comprehensive Commentary on People ex rel. Welch v. Maginley-Liddie (2025) 1. Introduction On 17 June 2025 the New York Court of Appeals...
Disjunctive Drafting and Bail Eligibility:  People ex rel. Ellis v. Imperati Establishes that Making a Terroristic Threat is a Bail-Eligible Offense Under CPL 510.10(4)(a)

Disjunctive Drafting and Bail Eligibility: People ex rel. Ellis v. Imperati Establishes that Making a Terroristic Threat is a Bail-Eligible Offense Under CPL 510.10(4)(a)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Disjunctive Drafting and Bail Eligibility: People ex rel. Ellis v. Imperati Establishes that Making a Terroristic Threat is a Bail-Eligible Offense Under CPL 510.10(4)(a) 1. Introduction People ex...
Presumptive Disbarment in Reciprocal Discipline: The New York Rule after Matter of Nguyen (2025)

Presumptive Disbarment in Reciprocal Discipline: The New York Rule after Matter of Nguyen (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Presumptive Disbarment in Reciprocal Discipline: The New York Rule after Matter of Nguyen (2025) Introduction On 17 June 2025 the Appellate Division, First Department, issued a per-curiam opinion in...
“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners

“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners Introduction In Mark A. Hackel v. Macomb...
County Charter Ordinances as “Law” for Independent Counsel & the 60-Day UBAA Clock: Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (2025)

County Charter Ordinances as “Law” for Independent Counsel & the 60-Day UBAA Clock: Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (2025)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
County Charter Ordinances as “Law” Authorizing Independent Counsel & the Trigger of the 60-Day UBAA Suit Period: An In-Depth Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (Mich....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert