...quasi-estoppel doctrine, reasonably relied on the oral statements made at the June 2001 meeting.
The Smiths then moved to amend their answer to add counterclaims for breach of oral...Smiths incorrectly assert that the district court erred in finding that they failed to illustrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding their quasi-estoppel claim. The doctrine of quasi-estoppel "prevents a party from asserting a right, to the detriment of another party, which is inconsistent with a position previously taken." C G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway Dist. No. 4, 139 Idaho 140, 144, 75 P.3d 194, 198 (2003). This doctrine applies...contract, fraud, and promissory estoppel. This motion was denied. Subsequently, both the Smiths and the Respondents filed a motion for summary judgment regarding the issue of quasi-estoppel. In...