...actually have limited the use of quasi-contract to a narrow range of cases, a range of cases that does not include this one. It backs its argument with a multitude of assertions. First, it asserts that..., GECC presents another "contract bar" argument: that Midcoast elected to pursue — and win — a contract remedy against AAI, therefore it is barred from pursuing a quasi-contract remedy against GECC. It is not clear whether the Illinois doctrine of election of remedies would allow Midcoast to recover from GECC. That doctrine bars a plaintiff from pursuing inconsistent remedies. People ex rel. Ames v. Marx, 370 Ill. 264, 18 N.E.2d 915 (1938). It is used in cases where...found in many of Illinois's recent quasi-contract cases. See, e.g., Woodfield Lanes, Inc. v. Village of Schaumburg, 168 Ill.App.3d 763...