...possibility of reverter in Austin, which, being a mere contingency, is not considered an interest in land and cannot be aliened or sold. Appellees, without attempting to define the interest originally...defining a possibility of reverter are so numerous and technical in the use of the terms employed that they are more confusing than helpful. In Walker v. Irvine's Ex'r..., 263 Ky. 61, 91 S.W.2d 990, 991, an interest identical to that originally retained by F.L. Austin was described as a "possibility of reversion."
At common law, a true possibility of reverter was...