..., the sheriff did not proceed to sale under that levy. Instead, on December 17, 1969 he returned the writ of execution into court, marked "unsatisfied," with a copy of the levy attached.
However, defendant's brief states that plaintiff had failed to send the sheriff the deposit required to be made before the sale would be advertised.
Thereafter, under date of October 19, 1973, an alias execution..., 1969). That levy was made under a writ of execution which had been returned marked "unsatisfied" on December 17, 1969. There is no warrant for plaintiff's attempt, four years later, to attack the propriety of that return and to urge the continued viability of the September 2, 1969 levy — particularly since plaintiff thereafter caused an alias writ...of execution to issue. Cf. Schneider v. Schmidt, 86 N.J. Eq. 366 (Ch. 1916); Fredd v. Darnell, 107 N.J. Eq. 249 (Ch. 1930).
In view of our ruling reversing the cancellation of plaintiff's judgment lien, the remedy presently available to plaintiff is to cause another alias writ...