..., a nonsuit is proper only when, viewing all of the evidence in the plaintiff's favor, the factfinder cannot reasonably conclude that all elements of a cause of action have been established. West Philadelphia Therapy Ctr. v. Erie Ins. Group, 751 A.2d 1166, 1167 (Pa.Super.2000).
¶ 9 In support of their position, the defendants point to section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which...character of the defendant's act, the nature and extent of the harm to the plaintiff that the defendant caused or intended to cause and the wealth of the defendant.
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 908(2) (1979). The defendants argue that our Supreme Court's subsequent decision in Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc., 521 Pa. 97, 555 A.2d 800 (1989), in which the Court revisited section 908...concluded that, in determining an appropriate punitive damage award, it is the jury's province to assess the factors outlined in section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, i.e., (1) the...