Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
E.D. Pa.
2673
Cal. Ct. App.
2333
Ill. App. Ct.
2296
Tex. App.
2195
Conn. Super. Ct.
1903
Pa. Super. Ct.
1903
S.D.N.Y.
1857
Ohio Ct. App.
1751
N.D. Ill.
1446
D.D.C.
1387
Wash. Ct. App.
1348
D.N.J.
1286
3d Cir.
1254
5th Cir.
1245
N.J. Super. App. Div.
1212
N.Y. App. Div.
1150
9th Cir.
1112
Ariz. Ct. App.
1104
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1081
D. Mass.
1055
Mo. Ct. App.
1053
D. Md.
1028
M.D. Pa.
1025
W.D. Pa.
1019
2d Cir.
978
D. Ariz.
922
7th Cir.
876
Iowa
871
Pa.
829
6th Cir.
799
10th Cir.
791
N.Y. Misc.
791
8th Cir.
784
Mich. Ct. App.
771
N.D. Cal.
764
Tenn. Ct. App.
754
Mass.
748
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
736
Ky. Ct. App.
723
D. Colo.
709
D. Conn.
708
D.N.M.
703
D. Kan.
678
Or.
676
Md.
667
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
667
1st Cir.
642
E.D.N.Y.
636
Mass. App. Ct.
634
D. Nev.
621
Ind. Ct. App.
614
Wash.
613
Del. Super. Ct.
610
Conn.
603
Ala.
596
Minn. Ct. App.
588
Alaska
583
Ga. Ct. App.
576
S.D. Ohio
575
Minn.
571
La. Ct. App.
569
E.D. Mich.
567
Tex.
565
W.D. Ky.
558
Wis.
557
4th Cir.
549
Miss.
539
S.D. Tex.
537
Colo. App.
535
N.D. Ohio
523
M.D. Fla.
521
Or. Ct. App.
521
D. Minn.
514
S.D. Fla.
501
Mo.
499
D.C. Cir.
489
D.C.
488
W.D. Wash.
486
11th Cir.
484
Tex. Civ. App.
472
Conn. App. Ct.
459
E.D. Ky.
456
N.J.
449
D. Haw.
441
Wis. Ct. App.
441
Cal.
435
Neb.
435
D. Or.
433
Mont.
412
N.Y.
409
E.D. Mo.
406
E.D. Cal.
403
D. Del.
402
Utah
398
Wyo.
398
N.H.
396
Idaho
394
N.M. Ct. App.
394
D.V.I.
381
Iowa Ct. App.
381
S.D.W. Va.
381
Pa. Cmmw. Ct.
375
N.D. Tex.
371
Vt.
367
S.D.
366
N.D. Ind.
365
Kan.
363
D. Utah
356
Me.
356
D. Me.
350
U.S.
350
S.D. Ind.
347
E.D. Va.
346
Mich.
343
Ariz.
341
W. Va.
334
N.D. Iowa
330
D.N.H.
328
Ind. App.
327
Del. Ch.
320
Ohio
320
D.S.C.
317
E.D. La.
315
S.D. Cal.
313
N.C. Ct. App.
311
Ill.
310
Ark.
303
Colo.
297
M.D. Tenn.
294
Nev.
291
Mass. Cmmw.
289
Okla.
283
C.D. Cal.
252
N.D. Ala.
251
S.D. Ill.
251
N.D.
249
D. Neb.
248
S.C.
246
D.S.D.
243
Tenn.
240
N.M.
239
Fla.
237
W.D. Tenn.
236
Kan. Ct. App.
234
N.D. Okla.
232
Del.
230
S.D. Miss.
222
D. Vt.
219
E.D. Wis.
216
Haw.
216
D.R.I.
214
Ind.
214
R.I.
213
S.C. Ct. App.
209
Utah Ct. App.
209
E.D. Tenn.
207
Me. Super.
207
W.D. Mo.
206
W.D. Tex.
205
D. Mont.
203
Ky.
202
N.J. Super.
202
D. Idaho
200
Va.
199
W.D. Va.
193
R.I. Super.
192
M.D. Ala.
185
N.D.N.Y.
185
N.C.
183
N.D. Ga.
182
W.D. Mich.
181
La.
177
W.D. Wis.
164
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
162
Miss. Ct. App.
158
Ga.
155
D. Alaska
152
Fed. Cir.
150
S.D. Iowa
149
W.D. Okla.
148
E.D. Tex.
145
Haw. Ct. App.
144
M.D.N.C.
142
W.D.N.Y.
142
B.A.P. 9th Cir.
137
Bankr. D. Mass.
137
W.D. La.
132
D.P.R.
131
E.D. Ark.
118
Ala. Civ. App.
117
E.D. Wash.
117
N.D. Miss.
112
C.D. Ill.
109
Ohio Misc.
108
N.D.W. Va.
104
W.D. Ark.
104
W.D.N.C.
104
Okla. Civ. App.
103
Ark. Ct. App.
97
E.D.N.C.
97
Bankr. E.D. Pa.
91
S.D. Ala.
91
S.D. Ga.
85
N.D. Fla.
78
D.N.D.
76
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
74
Mass. Dist. Ct. App.
73
Bankr. D.N.M.
71
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
68
Idaho Ct. App.
67
Bankr. D.N.J.
66
Okla. Crim. App.
66
Neb. Ct. App.
64
Bankr. D. Colo.
63
Va. Ct. App.
62
M.D. La.
61
Ohio Ct. Cl.
60
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
59
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
58
Bankr. D. Del.
58
Bankr. N.D. Tex.
57
Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.
56
Bankr. E.D. Va.
54
Bankr. S.D. Tex.
53
Fed. Cl.
53
N.Y. Ct. Cl.
53
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
51
D. Wyo.
51
N. Mar. I.
48
M.D. Ga.
46
Bankr. S.D. Ohio
44
Nev. App.
44
Bankr. D. Conn.
41
Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
41
Bankr. D. Md.
40
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
39
Bankr. W.D. Tex.
37
Bankr. D. Kan.
35
Ohio Com. Pleas
35
Bankr. D. Minn.
34
Ala. Crim. App.
33
U.S.T.C.
33
E.D. Okla.
32
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
31
Bankr. W.D. Mo.
31
Bankr. S.D. Fla.
30
B.A.P. 10th Cir.
29
Bankr. E.D. Cal.
29
Bankr. M.D. Pa.
29
Bankr. N.D. Ala.
28
Alaska Ct. App.
27
Bankr. D. Mont.
27
Bankr. D. Neb.
27
B.A.P. 8th Cir.
26
Bankr. D. Utah
26
Bankr. N.D. Cal.
26
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
26
Bankr. N.D. Okla.
26
Bankr. D. Idaho
25
Bankr. N.D. Ind.
25
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
25
Bankr. D. Or.
23
Bankr. E.D. Tex.
23
Bankr. N.D.W. Va.
23
Bankr. S.D. Miss.
23
Bankr. W.D. Wis.
22
T.C.
22
D.N. Mar. I.
21
Bankr. D. Ariz.
20
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
20
Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
20
Bankr. D.D.C.
19
Bankr. E.D. Wis.
19
N.Y. Civ. Ct.
19
Tex. Crim. App.
19
Bankr. E.D. Ky.
18
Bankr. E.D. Mo.
18
Bankr. E.D. La.
17
Guam
17
Bankr. D. Haw.
16
Bankr. D.N.H.
16
Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
16
Bankr. S.D. Cal.
16
N.H. Super.
16
Bankr. D.S.C.
15
Va. Cir. Ct.
15
B.A.P. 1st Cir.
13
Bankr. D. Me.
13
Bankr. D. Vt.
13
Bankr. D.N.D.
12
Bankr. D.R.I.
12
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
12
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
12
Bankr. W.D. Ky.
12
Bankr. W.D. Wash.
12
Conn. C.P.
12
Mass. DIA
12
Bankr. D. Alaska
11
Bankr. E.D. Ark.
11
Bankr. N.D. Iowa
11
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
11
Tenn. Crim. App.
10
Bankr. D.S.D.
9
Bankr. E.D.N.C.
9
C.C.P.A.
9
Ct. Int'l Trade
9
D. Guam
9
Bankr. E.D. Wash.
8
Bankr. N.D. Miss.
8
Bankr. S.D. Ind.
8
N.C. Business
8
Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.
8
B.A.P. 6th Cir.
7
Bankr. M.D. La.
7
Bankr. S.D. Ga.
7
Bankr. W.D. Okla.
7
Bankr. W.D. Va.
7
Del. Com. Pleas
7
W. Va. Int. Ct. App.
7
Bankr. M.D. Ala.
6
Bankr. S.D. Iowa
6
Bankr. D. Wyo.
5
Bankr. D.V.I.
5
Bankr. W.D. La.
5
E.D.S.C.
5
N.Y. Dist. Ct.
5
N.Y. Fam. Ct.
5
Bankr. S.D. Ala.
4
Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
4
E.D. Ill.
4
N.J. Ch.
4
Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.
4
Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.
4
Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.
4
Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.
4
T.T.A.B.
4
B.I.A.
3
Bankr. C.D. Ill.
3
Bankr. D.P.R.
3
Bankr. N.D. Fla.
3
N.Y. Surr. Ct.
3
Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.
3
Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.
3
Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.
3
Bankr. D. Nev.
2
Bankr. E.D. Okla.
2
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
2
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
2
Ind. T.C.
2
Mass. Super.
2
Ops. La. Atty. Gen.
2
Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.
2
Or. T.C.
2
Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.
2
W.D.S.C.
2
B.A.P. 2nd Cir.
1
Bankr. S.D. Ill.
1
Cal. W.C.A.B.
1
D.R.I. (Bankr.)
1
Del. Fam.
1
E.E.O.C.
1
J.P.M.L.
1
N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. Ct.
1
N.C. Ind. Comn.
1
N.D. Ct. App.
1
N.J. Tax
1
N.Y. Crim. Ct.
1
N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.
1
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.
1
P.T.A.B.
1
Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.
1
App. T. 1st Dep't
0
App. T. 2d Dep't
0
Ariz. Tax Ct.
0
Ark. Work Comp.
0
Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n
0
B.T.A.
0
Bankr. D. Guam
0
Cal. Super.
0
Colo. Ind. App.
0
Conn. Cir. Ct.
0
Conn. Work Comp.
0
D. Ind.
0
D.C.Z.
0
Del. Gen. Sess.
0
Del. J.P. Ct.
0
Del. Jud.
0
Del. Orph.
0
Emer. Ct. App.
0
F.T.C.
0
FISA Ct.
0
M.D. Mich.
0
Mont. T.A.B.
0
N.C. Cir.
0
N.C. Super.
0
N.J. Cir. Ct.
0
N.L.R.B-ALJ
0
N.L.R.B-BD
0
N.L.R.B-UBD
0
N.L.R.B.
0
N.Y. App. Term
0
N.Y. City Ct.
0
N.Y. Cnty. Ct.
0
N.Y. County Ct.
0
N.Y. Just. Ct.
0
Okla. Ind. Review
0
Okla. Jud. Eth.
0
Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.
0
PTAB
0
S.D. W. Va.
0
Tenn. Ch.
0
Tenn. Cir.
0
Tex. J.P.M.L.
0
U.S.C.M.C.R.
0
Vet App.
0
Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
13311
From 2011 To 2020
25891
From 2001 To 2010
17252
From 1991 To 2000
13400
From 1981 To 1990
11002
From 1971 To 1980
6314
From 1961 To 1970
4122
From 1951 To 1960
3092
Before 1950
2752

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

1

...Feld, this Court Adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Section 908(2) states (2) Punitive damages may be awarded for...policy reasons why. In fact, we relied upon Section 908 of the Restatement of Torts and analyzed the verdict in conjunction with the factors set forth in Section 908(2). Section 908...the factors set forth in Section 908 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, but would also prohibit victims of malicious conduct, who...


Court:
Date: Mar 3, 1989 Cited By: 208 Coram: 1
2

.... In light of our grant of a new trial on the issue of liability, the issues regarding damages are moot. However, in anticipation of the same issues arising at retrial, we will address them. A. Punitive Damages This Court has embraced the guideline of Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding...harmful acts of third persons, as are common carriers, innkeepers and other owners of places of public resort. Section 344, comment (f) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, adopted by this court in...Section 323 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides: § 323 Negligent Performance of Undertaking to Render Services...


Court:
Date: Dec 18, 1984 Cited By: 471 Coram: 1
3

..., 517 A.2d 1270 (1986); Restatement of Torts, Section 908(1). In Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383, 485 A.2d 742 (1984), we adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of..., 192 A.2d 355, 358 (1963) (quoting comment b to Section 908[1] of the Restatement of Torts) (emphasis added). See Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. at...Section 908 further states that "[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see § 500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify...


Court:
Date: Mar 12, 1991 Cited By: 199
4

...indifferent to its client's investment objectives. In both cases, liability for punitive damages was predicated on Pennsylvania's adoption of section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Under...section 205 of the Restatement (Second) of Trusts, not section 908 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Although section 908 provides for punitive damages, section 205 does not, and...., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, MELLON BANK, N.A., APPELLANT, PENNSYLVANIA BANKERS ASSOCIATION; PROBATE AND TRUST LAW SECTION OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION...


Court:
Date: May 18, 1993 Cited By: 730 Coram: 1
5

...mandate. Section 908 (2) of the Restatement ( Second) of Torts (Tent. Draft No. 19, 1973), dealing with the assessment of punitive damages, does not require that any..., as well as any mitigating circumstances which may operate to reduce the amount of the damages. Restatement ( Second) of Torts § 908(2) (Tent. Draft No. 19, 1973); 22 Am. Jur...); Dobbs, Remedies § 3.9, at 205 (1973); McCormick, Damages § 77 (1935); Prosser, Torts § 2, at 9 (4th ed. 1971); Restatement ( Second) of Torts § 908(1...


Court:
Date: Jun 14, 1977 Cited By: 144
6

..., a nonsuit is proper only when, viewing all of the evidence in the plaintiff's favor, the factfinder cannot reasonably conclude that all elements of a cause of action have been established. West Philadelphia Therapy Ctr. v. Erie Ins. Group, 751 A.2d 1166, 1167 (Pa.Super.2000). ¶ 9 In support of their position, the defendants point to section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which...character of the defendant's act, the nature and extent of the harm to the plaintiff that the defendant caused or intended to cause and the wealth of the defendant. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 908(2) (1979). The defendants argue that our Supreme Court's subsequent decision in Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc., 521 Pa. 97, 555 A.2d 800 (1989), in which the Court revisited section 908...concluded that, in determining an appropriate punitive damage award, it is the jury's province to assess the factors outlined in section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, i.e., (1) the...


Court:
Date: Mar 13, 2007 Cited By: 21 Coram: 1
7

...rights. The aim of punitive damages is deterrence of similar conduct"). An award of punitive damages in Pennsylvania is explicitly circumscribed by the factors set forth in Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and...related concepts. This Court has embraced the guideline of section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding...cause and the wealth of the defendant." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2). See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908, comment (b) ("[T]he purpose of punitive damages is not...


Court:
Date: Aug 6, 1991 Cited By: 57 Coram: 1
8

...compensate "for conduct that is outrageous, because of the defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others." Fundamentally, punitive damages are penal in nature; the objective is to punish a tortfeasor for his outrageous conduct and to deter him from similar conduct in the future. Pennsylvania has adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which..., 192 A.2d 355 (1963); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS, § 908(2...evidence to establish: (1) that the defendant had a subjective appreciation of the risk of harm to which the plaintiff was exposed; and (2) that...


Court:
Date: Aug 24, 2018 Cited By: 19 Coram: 1
9

...the guideline of Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the imposition of punitive damages: 'Punitive damages may be awarded for conduct that is outrageous, because of the... E.D. Pa. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION No. 14-cv-02128...defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others.'" Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383, 395...


Court:
Date: Dec 8, 2014 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
10

..., the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides in relevant part: Punitive damages may be...against claims where the allegations are sufficient to bring those claims under the terms of the policy and the second duty is to pay that which it has agreed to pay in appropriate cases under the.... Filed July 27, 1987. Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia...


Court:
Date: Jul 27, 1987 Cited By: 25 Coram: 1
11

...overreached on costs and expenses. Haines also argues that the trial court erred by imposing $150,000 in punitive damages. This Court has adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding...indifference to the rights of others." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) (1977). See Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383...April 2, 1975, meeting, the judge put an initial settlement range on the case of between $500,000 and $3,000,000. N.T. 7/21/83 at 107. Haines reiterated his client's demand of $1.2 million. Mr. Moran, a...


Court:
Date: Mar 6, 1989 Cited By: 228 Coram: 1
12

...favorable to the non-moving party. The district court's order must be affirmed "unless the record is `critically deficient of the minimum quantum of evidence from which the jury might reasonably afford relief.'" Kinnel v. Mid-Atlantic Mausoleums, Inc., 850 F.2d 958, 961 (3d Cir. 1988). All parties agree that Pennsylvania law applies. As a general guide in assessing punitive damages, Pennsylvania recognizes the principles set forth in section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which..., 494 A.2d 1088, 1096 (1985) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2)); Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383...circumstances which would bring home to the realization of the ordinary reasonable man the highly dangerous character of his conduct." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 500, comment c. Instead, Martin...


Court:
Date: May 30, 1990 Cited By: 85 Coram: 2
13

...violation of the Act." The Third Circuit sought to distinguish between intentional and willful violations of the ADEA to avoid imposing double damages in almost every disparate treatment case. Id. Relying upon section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, the.... I Section 7(b) of the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 626(b), provides for liquidated damage awards when an employer...decision. Record on Appeal, Vol. 2, at 101-03. This finding, however, flies in the face of the jury's finding of intentional discrimination. If the jury believed that ACIPCO had truly selected another...


Court:
Date: Feb 24, 1987 Cited By: 81 Coram: 1
14

...general standard for punitive damages also encompasses an inquiry into "defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others." See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) (1977). However, the Thurston Court disclaimed a need to show "evil motive or bad purpose" as an element of willfulness. Thurston, 105 S.Ct. at 624 n. 19. Hence, more assistance for our purposes may be afforded by other aspects of the punitive damages standard. Section 908...Berroyer v. Hertz, 672 F.2d 334, 340 (3d Cir. 1982), we quoted the comments to section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts which state in part, "since...from similar conduct in the future." The essence of punitive damages is that they may be awarded "for conduct that is outrageous." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) (emphasis added...


Court:
Date: Sep 22, 1986 Cited By: 77 Coram: 1
15

.... C. Analysis Under Pennsylvania law, punitive damages are only available to compensate "for conduct that is outrageous, because of the defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others." Fundamentally, punitive damages are penal in nature; the objective is to punish a tortfeasor for his outrageous conduct and to deter him from similar conduct in the future. Pennsylvania has adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which...) OF TORTS, § 908(2)). See Feld, 485 A.2d at 1097-98..., a court reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint must take three steps. First, it must tak[e] note of the elements [the] plaintiff must plead to state a claim. Second, it should identify allegations...


Court:
Date: Jul 10, 2019 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
16

...908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the imposition of punitive damages. That provision permits punitive damages for conduct that is `outrageous because of the defendant's evil...motives or his reckless indifference to the rights of others.' Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) (1977). See Feld v..., (hereinafter "appellee"). The two (2) issues which have been presented for our review are: (1) whether appellee met her burden of proof at trial regarding the value of her personal property which was...


Court:
Date: Sep 30, 1993 Cited By: 16 Coram: 1
17

...is governed by Pennsylvania law. Pennsylvania follows section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and allows punitive damages only for "conduct that is outrageous, because of the defendant's..., 555 A.2d 800, 803 (1989) ( quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2)). The district court found no evidence to support an award of punitive damages..., 1583 (Fed.Cir. 1988) (survey not necessary to show acquired distinctiveness under section 2(f) of the Lanham Act). Since a consumer survey was not necessary for Jacquin to prove its claim, the refusal of...


Court:
Date: Dec 13, 1990 Cited By: 59 Coram: 1
18

...disregard of the rights of the party injured." Thompson v. Swank, 317 Pa. 158, 176 A. 211 (1934); see also SHV Coal, Inc. v. Continental Grain Co., 526 Pa. 489, 587 A.2d 702, 704 (1991). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which..., because of the defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to others." Restatement (Second) Torts § 908(2) (1979); see also Feld v. Merriam, 506 Pa. 383, 485 A.2d 742, 747-48 (1984). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has also discussed with approval Comment b of that section, which...." Restatement (Second) Torts § 908 cmt. b; see also SHV, 587 A.2d at 704-05; Martin v. Johns...


Court:
Date: Sep 3, 2004 Cited By: 145 Coram: 1
19

...section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides that: Punitive damages may be awarded for conduct that is outrageous, because of the.... Maassen, 904 F.2d 178, 181 (3d Cir. 1990) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2)). The Third Circuit has predicted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would adopt the narrow.... International Mill Servs., 617 F. Supp. 187, 189 (E.D.Pa. 1985). Courts have typically considered four-factors in making this determination: (1) the interrelation of operations, (2) common...


Court:
Date: Apr 26, 1994 Cited By: 53 Coram: 1
20

...damages are only available to compensate "for conduct that is outrageous, because of the defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others." Fundamentally, punitive damages are penal in nature; the objective is to punish a tortfeasor for his outrageous conduct and to deter him from similar conduct in the future. Pennsylvania has adopted Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which..., 411 Pa. 339, 192 A.2d 355 (1963); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS, § 908(2...] plaintiff must plead to state a claim. Second, it should identify allegations that, because they are no more than conclusions, are not entitled to the assumption of truth. Finally, [w]hen there are well...


Court:
Date: Sep 6, 2016 Cited By: 9 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).