CiteTEXT
...failure to obey traffic signals, signs, or directions, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-215. Respondent's letter contained th...failure to obey traffic signals, signs, or directions. Respondent informed the individual that a conviction for such an offense could impact his or her "freedom" and result in a "criminal record" "and or...jail, or both." N.J.S.A. 39:4-215.
Although an adjudication for failure to obey traffic signals can result in a ten-day...
...)(f) factor.
A.
The majority's support for the c(4)(f) factor rests entirely on the fact that there were signs of a....
The majority now holds that signs of a struggle support the c(4)(f) factor. Last year, the majority held that the absence of...signs of a struggle established the c(4)(f) factor. Loftin I, supra, 146 N.J. at 378, 680 A.2d 677 (noting that with no signs of a struggle, no other motive could explain why the...
...police officers, such traffic control signals or directions by police officers shall have precedence over stop signs and are controlling thereof. 6. ___: ___. A "go" signal at a street intersection...control situations of this kind and gave traffic control signals or directions by police officers precedence over stop signs. This would only seem...., 144 Neb. 808, 14 N.W.2d 660: "A driver of a motor vehicle about to enter a highway protected by stop signs must stop as directed, look in both directions and permit...
...afforded by N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 and the immunity afforded by N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 for failure to provide ordinary traffic signals. We disagree and reverse...immunity for failure to provide ordinary traffic signals is more difficult. We are nevertheless of the view that it too does not apply to the factual complex before us. N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 provides that...:
Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable under this chapter for an injury caused by the failure to provide ordinary traffic signals, signs...
...the provisions of the Ohio statutes the driver of the defendants' vehicle was required to obey and abide by all signals, signs, whistles and directions of police officers, and to obey all automatic...jury the eighth specification of negligence quoted above. Section 6310-35, General Code, provides: "Pedestrians and drivers of vehicles shall obey and abide by all signals, signs, whistles and...directions of police officers, and shall obey all automatic traffic signals."
The trial court entertained the view that there must be an ordinance authorizing in some form the...
...
"save your drivers [sic] license" are misleading. The offense at issue is failure to obey signals, signs,...:4-215 provides:
Any person who fails to obey the directions of a police officer or fails to obey the directional signals or signs provid...solicitation letters sent by respondents, on their firm's letterhead, to individuals who were purportedly charged with making an illegal U-turn (N.J.S.A. 39:4-215), speeding (N.J.S.A. ...
..., including driving an unregistered motor vehicle, N.J.S.A. 39:3–4, failing to observe traffic signals, N.J.S.A. 39:4–81, failure to maintain lane (two times), ..., reckless driving (four times), N.J.S.A. 39:4–96, improper left turn, N.J.S.A. 39:4–123b, failure to signal, N.J.S.A. 39:4–126, and ...petitioner had previously been convicted of disregarding a stop sign, failure to obey a directional signal, careless driving, driving without a license, improper passing, speeding, and placing injurious...
...reasonable manner" in accordance with the applicable statute, and (3) the judge committed reversible error in charging N.J.S.A. 39:4-90 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-67 with reference to an intersection gover...).
However, we do agree with plaintiff that the judge committed reversible error in charging N.J.S.A. 39:4-90, which provides, in pertinent part, that when two vehicles enter an intersection at...jury was properly instructed that a vehicle on a stop street must yield the right-of-way to all traffic on a through street which is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard. N.J.S.A. 39:4-144...
..., 243 N.W. 552. There we held that failure to obey a statutory law of the road is negligence per se, except that violation of what is now section 321.298 is...specifically provided, the failure to obey any of the provisions of the statutes or ordinances providing the manner, method of the use and operation of vehicles on the highways, including streets, together with...."
We have not heretofore definitely decided whether failure to sound a horn before attempting to pass a preceding...
...life or property;
"(4) Disregard regulations governing direction of movement or turning in specified directions; and
"(5...he does not endanger life or property. (4) Disregard regulations governing direction of movement or turning in specified directions.'
"Although the statute...exempt from speed regulations.
N.J.S.A. 39:4-103.
"The decisive issue in this case is whether a police officer is liable for damage caused by a vehicle...
......................... 182 C. Constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(c) ............... 197 IV. Pretrial Issues ............................................... 212 A. Selection of Essex.............................. 279 C. Flight Charge .............................................. 282 D. Constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(c) as Applied to Defendant...requirement. The Legislature also clarified its intention concerning jury deadlock, requiring the trial court to inform the jury explicitly that its failure to reach a unanimous death verdict would result...
....
3. Failure to yield the right of way to an emergency vehicle.
4. Traveling in excess of the posted speed limit.
....
2. Failure to maintain a proper lookout.
3. Failure to yield the right of way to defendant.
4. Traveling in...long as he does not endanger life or property. (4) Disregard regulations governing direction of movement or turning in specified directions."
Although the statute...
...exonerate a public entity from liability for failure to protect against a dangerous condition as provided in [N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to -9]." A separate relevant provision of the TCA deals with public employees. It...recreational facilities; provided, however, that nothing in this section shall exonerate a public entity from liability for failure to protect against a dangerous condition as provided in [N.J.S.A. 59:-1 to 4-10..., regardless of whether lifeguards were present. See, e.g., Knight v. City of Capitola, 4 Cal.App. 4th 918, 6 Cal.Rptr.2d 874 (1992) (holding no liability for failure to warn for...
...control, and failed and neglected to yield the right of way to the defendant's vehicle traveling upon Wheeler Avenue or Highway 22 truck route; plaintiffs failed to heed the traffic signs and signals on...Department and the City of Fort Smith, at the point of its intersection with South Y Street, and plaintiffs' automobile was enjoined by statute and ordinance and by traffic warning signs erected upon said...intersection and was traversing a through highway and was in a position of peril and danger if the plaintiff should fail to heed and obey the traffic laws of the State of Arkansas; that nevertheless...
..., its procedure for loading the trucks, and he specifically directed the route and routine of the trucks as they approached the shovel to be loaded. He testified he gave his directions by hand signs...of and under the direction of one or the other. It is not conclusive that in practice he would be likely to obey the directions of the general employer in case of conflict of orders. The question...be done and give signals and directions as to details of the work and the manner of doing it, and it was necessary that the operator co-operate with representatives of the department. But such co...
...Mall to the Capitol Grounds, obeying traffic signals and the directions of police officers along the way. At the Capitol the leaders were stopped by an officer of the Capitol Police, but were allowed...or obstructive. As we have seen however the police may validly order violent or obstructive demonstrators to disperse or clear the streets. If any demonstrator or bystander refuses to obey such an...is that no objection was taken below on the grounds now asserted and the grounds stated below were not valid. Appellants asserted surprise; there was none other than that caused by their own failure...
...§ 346.04(1), enacted in 1957 Laws of Wisconsin ch. 260, § 1, set forth a non-criminal forfeiture for the failure to obey “any lawful order, signal or direction from a traffic officer...demanded directions to the nearest police station because, as he said, Klinkhammer was “endangering my life.” As Hanson drove down the interstate, he was in constant communication with the 911 dispatcher...Hanson refused multiple requests by the dispatcher to pull over and continued to demand directions to the nearest police station, the dispatcher began guiding Hanson to the Pleasant Prairie police station...
..., modus operandi, and signs of ritual, finding unique similarities between the two crimes on all three grounds. First, Hazelwood concluded that both crimes were motivated by anger. In...filing a Notice of Aggravating Factors, alleging three such factors: the murder involved aggravated assault or torture,N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(c); the murder was committed... to escape apprehension for another offense, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(f); and the murder was committed during the commission of, or attempt to commit, or flight...
...used by the public without protest. Also, that although signs were placed along the railroad reading, "Warning, do not walk on track or bridges," by implication this was an invitation to use the path... doubt that the defendants knew of such use and thereby acquiesced in the disregard by the public of the warning signs.
It is...upon the cross-ties; that when they reached the path, they looked in both directions for a train, but none was in sight and the deceased was not guilty of negligence in not looking back oftener than...
MOTIONS (Beta)
....)
Similarly, the fact that the officers did not obey stop signs or may have at times been traveling above the speed limit does not necessarily mean that the officers breached a duty of care...for the safety of others. Moreover, although Scanlan and Bongiorno did not obey stop signs, they were privileged to do so by 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3105(b)(2). Based on the evidence, we do not believe... 105:19, 108:6-13, 109:14-22.) Bongiorno and Scanlan also did not stop at the stop signs. (Scanlan Dep. 50:21-51:4.) During the pursuit, Bongiorno had his emergency...