Court Filter
FEDERAL COURTS
STATE COURTS
BANKRUPTCY   Select All
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Motion Filter
Filter by Motion (Beta)
*Please select motion
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards73411
From 2011 To 2020207331
From 2001 To 201074454
From 1991 To 200034599
From 1981 To 199025472
From 1971 To 198020530
From 1961 To 197015452
From 1951 To 196013675
Before 195049439

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...proceeding between Michelle A. Ciesluk (Mother) and Christopher J. Ciesluk (Father), Mother appeals the trial court order denying her motion to modify parenting time pursuant to section 14-10-129, C.R.S.... (2004). We hold that section 14-10-129, as amended, eliminates the three-part test set forth in In re Marriage of Francis, 919 P.2d 776...child's best interests. Ultimately, it is incumbent upon the trial court to consider all of the relevant factors under subsection 14-10-129(2)(c) and to decide what arrangement will serve the child's...

...orders to accommodate that change." Upon its own motion, the court appointed a special advocate and set a hearing for allocation of parental responsibility pursuant to subsection 14-10-124(1.5). In its subsequen...parties in accordance with subsection 14-10-124(1.5). However, the court held that even if subsection 14-10-129(2) applied, its holding would be the same. Based on the testimony of...constitute an abuse of discretion. A. Section 14-10-124, not Section 14-10-129, Applies in an Initial Determination to Allocate Parental Responsibilities...

.... After reviewing all the statutory factors set forth in §§ 14-10-124(1.5)(a) and 14-10-129(2)(c), C.R.S.2006, she recommended that mother be permitted to relocate. After hearing.... Father contends that the trial court erred in allowing mother to file a motion to remove the children from Colorado pursuant to § 14-10-129(1)(a)(II), C.R.S.2006. He argues that because...the children did not reside with either parent a majority of the time, § 14-10-129(1 )(a)(II) does not apply, and thus, the court should...

...pursuant to section 14-10-129(4), C.R.S. 2007, alleging that the children were in imminent physical or emotional danger. That afternoon, mother, accompanied by police, removed the children from...be restricted pursuant to section 14-10-129(4) (supervised parenting time) and further ordered that the matter be set for a forthwith hearing. The hearings commenced July 1, 2004...establish that the predicate in part for the granting of the Court's motion is subject to specific evidentiary consideration as to the sufficiency of continued restricted parenting time under § 14-10-129(4...

...that the children's wishes should be determinative of their best interests. The magistrate disagreed. Applying the endangerment standard in §§ 14-10-129(2)(d) and 14-10-131(2)(c...statutory change in §§ 14-10-129 and 14-10-131, C.R.S. 2001, the endangerment standard generally applied to modifications of sole custody. The best interests standard was used to modify joint custody...unchanged. Then, as now, the best interests of a child were determined by reference to the factors in § 14-10-124(1.5), C.R.S. 2001, and the endangerment standard concerne...

...majority of the time as an enforcement remedy under section 14-10-129.5(2)(b), C.R.S. 2020, without applying the endangerment standard of sect...court purported to enforce its original order by modifying its parenting time provisions. Section 14-10-129 addresses parenting time modifications...interests of the child. § 14-10-129(2). ¶ 11 Even if the court finds changed circumstances and...

...section 14-10-129(4), C.R.S. (2019), requires a hearing within fourteen days of the filing of the motion. The court holds that the particularity requirement in C.R.C.P. 7(b...)(1) provides the proper standard to review a section 14-10-129(4) motion. Because the respondent's motion to restrict parenting time was sufficiently particular under Rule 7(b)(1), the supreme court...concludes that section 14-10-129(4) required a hearing on that motion within fourteen days. Accordingly, the supreme court concludes that the magistrate erred in not holding a hearing and that the...

...-10-129(1.5) and 14-10-131(1), C.R.S.2005, the court could not modify parenting time until two years had elapsed after the entry of the initial divorce decree in Texas. Father responded that the two...§ 14-10-129, C.R.S.2005. The court also determined that any request by father to modify parental responsibilities was similarly time barred under § 14-10-131, C.R.S.2005.... Father contends the trial court erred in concluding that his motion to modify parenting time was time barred. He argues that § 14-10-131 does not apply to motions for modification of parenting time. He also su...

...to the best interests of the child standard under section 14-10-129(1)(a)(I), C.R.S. 2024. Therefore, he asserts that, by applying the endangerment standard under section 14-10-129(2), the court...improperly denied his request without a hearing. We agree. ¶ 8 Section 14-10-129(1)(a)(I) provides that, with certain exceptions, a court may modify parenting time when doing so... "would serve the best interests of the child." Section 14-10-129(2) specifies the circumstances in which a court may "modify a prior...

...responsibilities, and child support pursuant to §§ 14-10-129, 14-10-131, and 14-10-115, C.R.S. 2004. At the same time, father moved for the appointment of a special advocate and sought a ...party. After determining that the relevant statute was § 14-10-129, the court adopted the special advocate's findings and recommendations and ordered (1) that decisions regarding...appeals from this order. I. Mother contends that the trial court erred in applying § 14-10-129 to this case and in determining...

...section 14-10-129(4), C.R.S. 2021, requires the moving parent to prove, at the emergency hearing, that the child is in imminent danger. Interpreting the plain language of...section 14-10-129(4) - and applying it in harmony with section 14-10-129(1)(b)(I) - the division concl...section 14-10-129(4), a moving parent need not prove, at the emergency hearing, that the child is in imminent danger; and (2) the district court must apply the...

...of Marriage Act requires motions to modify such as father's be based on "facts that have arisen since the prior decree or that were unknown to the court at the time of the prior decree," §§ 14-10-129(2...father's be based on "facts that have arisen since the prior decree or that were unknown to the court at the time of the prior decree," §§ 14-10-129(2), -131(2), C.R.S. 2021, the court's denial of his...Colorado, father also filed an emergency motion to restrict mother's parenting time pursuant to section 14-10-129(4). Less than two weeks later...

...are incident to custody orders and must further the best interests of the child. Section 14-10-129(2), C.R.S. 1973; Harrison v. Harrison, 170...would be significantly impaired in the absence of such modification. We disagree. Section 14-10-129, C.R.S. 1973, defines visitation rights as follows: (1) A.... See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Barnes, 191 Colo. 278, 552 P.2d 300 (1976). The language of § 14-10-129(1...

...interests to remain with the primary residential parent when that parent moves. We reject this contention. Section 14-10-129, C.R.S. 2003, was amended, effective September 1, 2001, to set...between the child and the other party. Section 14-10-129(1)(a)(II), C.R.S. 2003, provides that, when considering a relocation request in these circumstances, the court shall take into...account all relevant factors, including those set forth in § 14-10-129(2)(c), C.R.S. 2003. The factors specified in § 14-10-129(2)(c) include the factors enumerated in § 14-10-12...

...interests of the child standard in substantially reducing his parenting time instead of the endangerment standard set forth in § 14-10-129(1)(b)(I), C.R.S. 2003. We disagree. Whether...." Section 14-10-124(1.5), C.R.S. 2003. However, a parent's "parenting time rights" cannot be "restricted" unless the court finds that the parenting time "would endanger the child's physical health or significan...parenting time rights." Section 14-10-129(1)(a)(I), C.R.S. 2003. The term "parenting time rights" is not defined. This term introduces the concept of "rights," which is not present...

..., 773 P.2d 635 (Colo.App. 1989). See §§ 14-10-129(2) and 19-1-102(1)(b), C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.). Reasonable parenting time is mandated and restrictions on... impair the child's emotional development. Sections 14-10-129(1) and 14-10-129(2), C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.). See In re Marriage of Finer...) provides that temporary orders with respect to parenting time must be determined in accordance with the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, § 14-10-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.) (UDMA...

...under the guidelines at $427.12 per month. Relying upon § 14-10-129, C.R.S. 2000, the trial court further determined that father had the burden of proof to show that parenting time.... I. Father contends that because the cases were filed in the probate court, the trial court erred in applying § 14-10-129 and...child custody case and involves the allocation of parental responsibilities. See §§ 14-10-124(1.5), 14-13-102(4), C.R.S. 2000. Section 14-10-129 establishes the criteria applicable to the...

.... We hold that, because Father's motions to modify were material to his appeal and sections 14-10-129(1)(a)(I), C.R.S...that, because Father's motions to modify were material to his appeal and sections 14-10-129(1)(a)(I) and 14-10-131(2) do not specifically grant trial courts jurisdiction to modify parenting...) sections 14-10-129(1)(a)(I) and 14-10-131(2), which respectively grant trial courts jurisdiction to determine parenting time and decision...

...parent under section 14-10-129(2)(a), C.R.S. 2021, and consenting to the child's integration into the family of the nonresidential parent under...section 14-10-129(2)(b). Mesa County District Court No. 16DR30036 Honorable William T.... See § 14-10-129(1)(a)(I), (2), C.R.S. 2021; Barker, 251 P.3d at 592; see...

.... We hold that, because Father's motions to modify were material to his appeal and sections 14-10-129(1)(a)(I), C.R.S...hold that, because Father's motions to modify were material to his appeal and sections 14-10-129(1)(a)(I) and 14-10-131(2) do not specifically grant trial...rule on Father's motions to modify. We reach this conclusion for two reasons: (1) sections 14-10-129(1...