Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal60538
+ Bombay High Court47768
+ Karnataka High Court39286
+ Madras High Court37611
+ Kerala High Court33486
+ Allahabad High Court31232
+ Delhi High Court26364
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission26128
+ Patna High Court20472
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court18572
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court18512
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission18045
+ Central Administrative Tribunal17483
+ Gujarat High Court17481
+ Rajasthan High Court15707
+ Calcutta High Court15026
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court12493
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court11811
+ Chhattisgarh High Court10648
+ Supreme Court Of India10576
+ Central Information Commission10563
+ CESTAT9818
+ Telangana High Court8261
+ Gauhati High Court7019
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal6691
+ Jharkhand High Court6004
+ SEBI5966
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission5246
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission4998
+ National Company Law Tribunal4961
+ National Green Tribunal4730
+ Orissa High Court4102
+ RERA3744
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court2822
+ Uttarakhand High Court2709
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity2626
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2013
+ Meghalaya High Court1835
+ Tripura High Court1475
+ Manipur High Court1365
+ Armed Forces Tribunal1131
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal823
+ Privy Council686
+ Company Law Board562
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act535
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal503
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal441
+ Sikkim High Court438
+ Competition Commission Of India411
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST374
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange281
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board262
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal259
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India189
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority162
+ Board of Revenue152
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST120
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission96
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property89
+ Authority For Advance Rulings78
+ Railway Claims Tribunal71
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction67
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board56
+ District Court42
+ Commissioner (Appeals)38
+ Settlement Commission35
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India30
+ Collector Appeals9
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal9
+ Trade Marks Registry6
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property2
+ AAR-GST1
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal1
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs1
+ Copyright Board1
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Right to Information1
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards291431
From 2011 To 2020191257
From 2001 To 201033645
From 1991 To 200013368
From 1981 To 19907823
From 1971 To 19805173
From 1961 To 19704657
From 1951 To 19604320
Before 19505845

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...to defendant No. 2. The effect of the defendant not getting leave to defend would be that the plaintiff becomes entitled to judgment forthwith under the provisions of Order 37 Rule 3(6)(a) CPC...its order dated November 26, 1993 passed in the aforesaid Special Leave Petitions was pleased to grant special leave granting conditional leave to the defendants 2 and 3 subject to their depositing Rs...the same on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Trial Court”. Defendant No. 3 duly deposited a sum of Rs. 1 Crore which was accepted and appropriate orders regarding its withdrawal by the...

...of Order 37, Rule 3(6)(a) of CPC, the effect of dismissal of the application for leave to contest, would be the same as if no application had at all been made...1. This summary suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 of the CPC on the basis of a promissory note dated 4.8.94 executed by the defendant. During the pendency of the suit...duly brought on record. 3. The brief background of the case to the extent relevant for the purposes of the present judgment are briefly capsulated parawise hereinbelow...

...37 Rule 3(6) (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties at length.3. When the suit appeared on board on 25 August 2015, the.... The Respondent has invoked provisions of Order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure and has filed a Summary Suit. The Summary procedure is provided with legislative intent to...of order XXXVII of Rule 3 and 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, does not have power to recall its own order and remedy is to approach the higher court. Therefore the consequences of not...

...irregularities stating that the petitioner has lost faith in that particular Court, permission was accorded for filing written statement without adhering to the mandatory procedure prescribed under Order 37, Rule 3...orders were passed, written statement was accepted contrary to Order 37, Rule 3 (5) of CPC the petitioner was constrained to file Civil Revision Petition Nos.189 and 191 of 2022. There were... 7 (197 6) 3 SCC 57 4...

...FILE OF XXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED U/ORDER 37 RULE 3(6)(a) FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. ...Order 37 of C.P.C.? 2. If so, whether plaintiff is entitled for decree under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(a) of C.P...invoices;  there is no written contract between plaintiff and the plaintiff is a Private Limited Company with regard to the alleged supply of goods and therefore, the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule...

...has also not been controverted by the defendant in the application for leave to defend and no other explanation for issuance of the said cheques been furnished.(e) Order 37 Rule 3(6)(...which the suit is based are without any consideration;(d) that the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 Rule 3(4) of the CPC for issuance of the...Order 37 Rule 4 of the CPC where the plea of the defendant was of being not served with the summons for judgment in accordance with law and being thus not able to apply for leave to defend. On...

.... In view of dismissal of all applications and OA, per Order 37 Rule 3(6) (a) CPC leave no other option with this Court except to decree the suit of the plaintif...filed then the application under Order 37 Rule 7 CPC only would lie, Order 37 CPC being a complete Code. Hence, there was no need to file OA No.21/2017, the same being misconceived is also dismiss...dates and facts relevant are noted hereunder:- a) The plaintiff instituted this suit under Order 37 of the Civil 1...

...being so served, the result would be as contemplated under Order 37 Rule 3 Sub-rule 6(a), CPC which provides for the consequences of a defendant being ...the nature contemplated by Order XXXVII, CPC, and defendants have not filed leave to defend, therefore in terms of Order 37 Rule 3 Sub-rule 6(a) of CPC,...S. Mukerjee, J.:— This is a summary suit filed under Order 37 of CPC. Defendants 1 and 2 were served through official Liquidator since these companies are in liquidation. Defendant No. 3...

...summons to the defendants for settlement of issues. In my view, the procedure adopted by the trial court is not correct. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 2 of Order 37 and sub-rule (6)(a) of...petitioner claimed the balance amount on the basis of the pronote by way of a suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure.3. Notice and summons were...Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure read as follows:—“(3) The defendant shall not defend the suit referred to in sub-rule (1) unless he enters...

..., per sub clause (b) of sub rule (6) of Rule 3 Order 37 of the CPC, the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment forthwith. The said sub rule read as under:...HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J. 1. Vide order dated 15.02.2017 the defendant was granted conditional leave to defend the suit on his deposit of a sum...of `3,82,00,000/-, in the Court within a period of one month from 15.02.2017. Out of said amount, `1.80Crore was to be released to the plaintiff to satisfy her claim towards principal amount...

...) of CS (OS) No.1062/2014 Page 2 of 2 sub rule (6) of Rule 3 Order 37 of the CPC, the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment forthwith. The said sub rule read as under:- (...HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J. 1. Vide order dated 15.02.2017 the defendant was granted conditional leave to defend the suit on his deposit of a sum...of `6,27,39,282/-, in the Court within a period of one month from 15.02.2017. Out of said amount `2.38Crore was to be released to the plaintiff to satisfy her claim towards principal amount...

...Gujarat whereby and whereunder a first appeal filed by the respondent herein was allowed setting aside a decree passed in favour of the appellant herein under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(b) of the.... Rule 3 of Order 37 provides for a judgment at the hearing of such summons; sub-rule 6(b) whereof reads as under:“3. (6) At the heari....14. A decree passed subsequent to the refusal of leave to defend could either be under Order 37 Rule 3(6) of the Code or it could be based on t...

...the refusal of leave to defend could either be under Order 37 Rule 3(6) of the Code or it could be based on the affidavit evidence on the side of the plaintiff and the documents produced or even based on o...had made out a good case for obtaining leave to defend the suit.8. Order 37, Rule 3(5) of the Code reads, thus:“3. (5) The defendant may...on account of dishonoured cheques. The said suit was filed in terms of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the “Code”). The respondents filed an application purported to be under Order 37 Rule ...

...enunciated under Order 37 Rule 3 sub-Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Srinagar, held that in these circumstances, the plaintif...the suit in accordance with the Rule 3 of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the plaintiff/ respondent herein filed an application buttressed with an...order 37 rule 4 CPC were explained, but instead of returning a finding on the same, the trail court conclusively determined the suit. 2. That the trial...

...been passed in terms of Sub-rule (6)(a) of Rule 3 of Order 37. The learned counsel submits that the petition filed on 19-4-1995 for extending the time to file t.... I find no merit in the contention of the learned counsel. Sub-rule (6)(a) of Rule 3 of the Order 37 says:“(6) At the hearing of such s...1. This C.R.P is filed against the order of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, extending time to file the petition for leave to defend. The petitioner is the plaintiff in a...

..., granting leave to defend the suit with a condition to deposit Rs.50,000/- within one month from the date of order and also refused to pass a decree as provided under Order 37 Rule 3(...in terms of Order 37 Page 2 of 6 Rule 3(6)(b) of the Code. He has further submitted that, there is no statutory pr...circumstances, he could not deposit the amount. Meanwhile, the petitioner-plaintiff vide Exh.27 dated 09.08.2012, applied before the Court below to pass judgment in terms of Order 37 Rule 3(6)(b) of the Co...

...defend, the consequence is as if no application for leave to defend at all was filed and, thereupon in terms of Order 37 Rule 3 Sub-rule 6(a) of CPC, the plaint...earlier fallen due on 23rd April, 1998. Despite cheques being presented much later, and as per desired date of the defendant, still the same were dishonoured. 6. A legal notice was served...submissions made earlier, the judgment was reserved. An application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC being IA No. 6024/02 was filed on which notice was issued but thereafter the same...

...appellant had been rendered stood significantly altered after the amendment of the Code in 1976. The learned counsel submitted that with the substitution of Rule 3, Order 37, the earlier decisions, right up to the ...to as “the Code”), for recovery of a sum of Euro 757,885.42 equivalent to Rs 3,86,52,156.42 in Indian currency. On being served with summons for judgment in terms of Rule 3 sub-rule (4) of Order ....13. It was urged that sub-rule (5) of Rule 3, Order 37 is important to this case in the sense that it recognises a dichotomy between a disputed claim and a...

...the present suit is decreed in accordance with the Order 37 Rule 3(6) CPC. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly....defendants. The same are allowed.I.As 1755-1756/2017 in CS(COMM) 603/20162. I.A 1756/2017 has been filed on behalf of defendants under Order 37 Rule 3(5...under Order 37 CPC on 05th and 07 November, 2015. The leave to defend was filed on 16 November, 2015 and subsequently re-filed on 04 December, 2015.4. However, as there were still certain...

...respondents/defendants in O.S.No.2387 of 2019 on the file of the 17thAdditional City Civil Court, Chennai and consequentially direct to decree the suit by following the order 37 Rule (...suit should not be granted, unless the admitted amount is deposited. Under Sub-clause (6)(a) of Order 37, Rule 3, C.P.C. at the hearing of the summons for judgment, if the...of money on the basis of promissory notes. He issued summons as per Form No.4- A under Order 37, Rule 3 CPC. 3. On...