...: (AIR 2007 SC 1087) MC Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) V/s. Union of India. Referring to Taj Corridors .... has allowed the Id. PP to take part in the investigation by obtaining PP's opinion which is legally impermissible. In Taj Corridor Scam Case reported in...(2007) 1 SCC (Cri) 264 : (AIR 2007 SC 1087) (M. C. Meheta (Taj Corridor Scam) V/s. Union of India...

...No. RC 18 relating to the Taj Heritage Corridor matter reported in M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India...706 directed CBI to conduct an inquiry on the basis of an IA filed in the aforesaid writ petition alleging various irregularities committed by the officers/persons in the Taj Heritage Corridor Project...Heritage Corridor Project under the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) Area at Agra.5. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, an FIR was lodged on 5-10-2003 being No. RC 0062003A0018 of...

....”7. M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (...competent Magistrate.8. After analysing the earlier judgments, this Court observed: (Taj Corridor Scam case...

...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110, loses all...earlier first information report lodged by the Vigilance Department was general in character while the later first information report being in respect of the scam relating to the appointment of panchayat...with the suggestion that it would like to get the scam investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation.35. Indisputably, the Central Bureau of Investigation had...

...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110.....3. A project known as “Taj Heritage Corridor Project” was initiated by the Government of Uttar Pradesh. One of the main purposes for which the same was undertaken was to divert River...Yamuna and to reclaim 75 acres of land between Agra Fort and the Taj Mahal and use the reclaimed land for constructing food plazas, shops and amusement activities. The said activities on the part of the...

...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110, in cases monitored by ...the conclusion of the investigation, referring to the earlier decisions in Vineet Narain (1996) 2 SCC 199, Sushil Kumar Modi (1998) 8 SCC 661 and M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam...only to reiterate this clear position in law so that no doubts in any quarter may survive.”13. In M.C Mehta v...

..., M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110 and ...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110, in cases monitored by ...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) (2007) 1 SCC 110, speaking for the Bench, one of us, (P. Sathasivam, J.) has observed as under: (Narmada Bai case...

...Court in Vineet Narain (1998) 1 SCC 226 and M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India...make one thing very clear that the team comprising of Shri Ishwar Chander, DIG, Shri L.K Yadav, SSP Moga and Shri Bhupinder Singh, DSP have done a commendable job in unearthing the scam...

....38. This Court in M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India...rendered in Criminal MC No. 405 of 2006, directing investigation of Crime No. 381 of 2005 of Koratty Police Station to be taken away from the investigating officer and entrusting the same to a special...to be clubbed with the anonymous petition.16. The Registry in compliance with the directions so issued by the learned Judge promptly registered a case in Criminal MC No...

...; Parkash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab, AIR 2007 SC 1274; and M.C Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Corridor Scam...

...(1998) 1 SCC 226 and M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India...principle, which is the essence of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as per the dictum of this Court in M.C Mehta v. Union of...

...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor scam) v. Union of India...21-10-2009. It is now widely known as “2G Spectrum Scam Case”. The case was registered against unknown officers of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) as well as unknown private persons and...)45.5 R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta...

...(Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110. In that case the Court was considering the scope of Section 173(2) of the....13. The High Court while coming to the aforesaid conclusion has greatly been swayed by the observation of this Court in M.C Mehta...

....69. In M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110 this Court again reiterated the same...India (2007) 6 SCC 171,(vi) M.C Mehta v. Union of India (2008) 1 SCC 407...

...prosecuted.3.3 In M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India...

...M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India..., M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (...affidavit he has also mentioned the details of the meeting convened by the then Chief Minister on 27-2-2002. On 27-4-2011, the petitioner was summoned by the Justice Nanavati and Mehta Commission of...

...(2000) 4 SCC 459, M.C Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 110 and...

...(Taj Corridor Scam) (supra), 6 (2011) 5 SCC 79 speaking for the Bench, one of us, (P. Sathasivam, J.) has observed as..., learned Counsel for the original petitioner - relative of the victim and Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Soni, learned APP for the State.2. It is an...Code of Criminal Procedure. We make this observation only to reiterate this clear position in law so that no doubts in any quarter may survive.”13. In M.C Mehta v...

...been held by this Court in Vineet Narain and M.C. Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India [(2007) 1 SCC 110], loses all...very clear that the team comprising of Shri Ishwar Chander, D.I.G, Shri L.K. Yadav, S.S.P. Moga and Shri Bhupinder Singh, D.S.P. have done a commendable job in unearthing the scam. We...