...) 4SCC 369; iv.) B.K. Ravichanda & Ors. V. Union of India, (2020) SCC Online SC 950; v.) Grahak Sanstha Manch v. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC 192; vi.) Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat, 1995 Supp (1) 596; vii.) Talat Fatima Hasan v. Syed Murtaza, (2020) 15 SCC 655; 34 viii.) Union of India and Another v. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8...) 2SCC 455; xii.) Union of India and Others v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd, (1985) 4SCC 369; xiii.) Union of India and Others v. Hindustan Development Corporation and Others, (1993) 3SCC 499; and xiv.) Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8.... Heavy reliance has also been place on the judgment delivered in the case of Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8...

...) 4SCC 369; iv.) B.K. Ravichanda & Ors. V. Union of India, (2020) SCC Online SC 950; v.) Grahak Sanstha Manch v. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC 192; vi.) Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat, 1995 Supp (1) 596; vii.) Talat Fatima Hasan v. Syed Murtaza, (2020) 15 SCC 655; 34 viii.) Union of India and Another v. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8...) 2SCC 455; xii.) Union of India and Others v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd, (1985) 4SCC 369; xiii.) Union of India and Others v. Hindustan Development Corporation and Others, (1993) 3SCC 499; and xiv.) Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8... 51. Heavy reliance has also been place on the judgment delivered in the case of Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8...

....) B.K. Ravichanda & Ors. V. Union of India, (2020) SCC Online SC 950; v.) Grahak Sanstha Manch v. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC 192; vi.) Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat, 1995 Supp (1) 596; vii.) Talat Fatima Hasan v. Syed Murtaza, (2020) 15 SCC 655; 34 viii.) Union of India and Another v. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8....) Income Tax Officer and Others v. M/s. Madnani Engineering Works Ltd, Calcutta, (1979) 2SCC 455; xii.) Union of India and Others v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd, (1985) 4SCC 369; xiii.) Union of India and Others v. Hindustan Development Corporation and Others, (1993) 3SCC 499; and xiv.) Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8...delivered in the case of Union of India and Anr. V. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, (2005) 8 SCC...

...counsel for the appellant placing reliance on the decision of this Court in Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Board of Sitapur AIR 1965 SC...Prag Narain v. Kadir Baksh ILR (1913) 35 All 145; Mohammad Mahud Khan v. Laja Mal AIR 1934 Lah 289 and Vithoba v. Bapu ILR (1891) 15 Bom 110 (DB...determine the lease under Section 111(g) and lay the suit for eviction.8. This Court in Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad case AIR 1965...

...(g) of Section 111. So just is the rule that it has been held applicable even in the areas where the Transfer of Property Act does not apply. (See: Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Board of...Amir Ahmad Khan 1988 Supp SCC 710.) We may quote with advantage the law as stated by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Hatimullah v.... P.V.K Krishna Rao (1989) 4 SCC 732, Kundan Mal v. Gurudutta (1989) 1 SCC 552 and Raja Mohammad...

....)13. In Lt. Col. K.D Gupta v. Union of India (1989) 3 SCC 566, AIR 1989 SC 2071 this Court dealt with a case wherein direction was...SC 2185, Niaz Mohammad v. State of Haryana (1994) 6 SCC 332, AIR 1995 SC 308, Chordia Automobiles v. S. Moosa...(2000) 3 SCC 282, Ashok Paper Kamgar Union v. Dharam Godha (2003) 11 SCC 1, State of Orissa v. Mohd. Illiyas...

... Vs. RESPONDENT: RAJA MOHAMMAD AMIR AHMAD KHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/02/1961 BENCH... http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 PETITIONER: GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS.... Lal, for the appellant. V. D. Misra, for the respondent. 1961. February 16. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPUR., J.-This is...

...deem it appropriate to deal with some important cases decided by this Court regarding the principle of adverse possession.14. In Secy. of State for India In Council v....15. This Court in P. Lakshmi Reddy v. L. Lakshmi Reddy AIR 1957 SC 314, while following the ratio of Debendra Lal Khan case....”20. In Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Govt. of India (2004) 10 SCC 779 at para 11, this Court observed as under...

...(1980) 1 An LT 488, (1980) 1 APLJ 173 (HC), Arjan Singh v. Union of India AIR 1987 Del 165 wherein...be entitled to consider the case of the defence. (See Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn. (2005) 7 SCC 510, (2005) 4 CTC 489...length on 30-8-2005. Counsel appearing for the appellant had relied upon a judgment of this Court in N.V Srinivasa Murthy v. Mariyamma (2005) 5 SCC...

...going to be released in favour of the heir of late Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan under the decision of the Government of India, as alleged.”The aforesaid...of his father late Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan and thereby he is entitled to the 25% or whatever percentage it may be, of the properties in suit, described in Schedule I of the plaint, which are....2. In order to appreciate the controversy arising in this appeal the facts are required to be set in detail:Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, writ...

...possession prior to the appointment of the Custodian declaring the property of Raja Mahmudabad, father of the respondent, as enemy property, based on duly authenticated tenancy created by the then Raja Mahmudabad or his general power of attorney shall not be covered by this Court's judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 2501 of 2002 dated 21-10-2005, titled Union of India v. Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan (2005...taken up by the regular Bench.2. IA No. 49 of 2010, has been filed by Mohammed Amir Mohammed Khan, in Mohammed Amir Mohammed Khan v. Commerce Ministry and disposed of by...Mohammed Amir Mohammed Khan, who had succeeded before the Bombay High Court and, thereafter, before this Court and was held to be the sole heir of the late Raja to succeed to his estate, for setting...

...Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya (1990) 4 SCC 76, Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India...larger conspiracy to systematically upturn the establishment to cause secession of J&K from the Union of India.3. Keeping in mind the special provisions in Section 43...witnesses in respect of whom protection was sought by the investigating agency.10. The High Court distinguished the decision of this Court in K. Veeraswami v. Union of...

...acquired land.15. This Court, in Kapil Mehra v. Union of India (2015) 2 SCC 262 while dealing with the matter held as...11,70,000 by one Mahmood son of Inshe Khan in favour of Smt Hanisha Khatoon wife of Mohammad Iqbal of the same village. The value per acre of the land, as per the said sale deed is calculated as Rs 72,00,000...sale consideration of Rs 11,70,000 by one Mahmood s/o Inshe Khan in favour of Smt Hanisha Khatoon w/o Mohammad Iqbal of the same village. If we calculate the value of per acre in terms of the above...

...connection the observations of this Court in Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Board of Sitapur AIR 1965 SC 1923. This Court observed in that...the payment of the amount was made. The nature of privy purses have been discussed in H.H Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji Rao Scindia Bahadur v. Union of India...CIT v. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan 1974 Tax LR 90 (AP) answered the question in favour of the revenue.5. The second question set out before, which was...

...Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Board of Sitapur AIR 1965 SC 1923, relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant highlights....2. The appellant has been in possession of the structure in question since 1953, when he was inducted therein by the owner one Nawab M. Ali Khan. In 1969 Nawab M. Ali Khan died, and it...the respondent, relied on the last sentence of para 1 of the plaint, as mentioned below, and contended that since Defendant 2 was not one of the heirs of the deceased Nawab M. Ali Khan, this sentence...

...meaning of the words “belonging to” had come up for discussion in Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Board of Sitapur AIR 1965 SC 1923..., the definition under Section 2(e) will apply.6. Raja Mohd. Amir Ahmed Khan v. Municipal Board of Sitapur AIR 1965 SC...at.2. In All India Rly. Institute Employees' Assn. v. Union of India (1990) 2 SCC 542, (1990) 13 ATC 691, AIR 1990 SC...

...a duly constituted suit.”10. The High Court then adverted to the decision in State of U.P. v. Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan...(1986) 3 SCC 156, AIR 1986 SC 1571, Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (2011) 8 SCC...Sub-Registrar (Registration) stands discharged, once the document is registered (see Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan AIR 1961 SC 787). Section...

...Court in Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal (1979) 3 SCC 4.13. Mr Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, learned counsel...such inference is possible.21. In Mohd. Usman Mohammad Hussain Maniyar v. State of Maharashtra (1981) 2 SCC 443 it...Bombay in Criminal Revision Application No. 288 of 2005 and in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1884 of 2006 respectively. By the first order, the High Court has repelled the challenge made to order dated...