DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REMAND
VIGIL, Justice.
{1} WHEREAS, this matter came before the Court on petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 12-501 NMRA seeking review of the Second Judicial District Court's order denying, among other things, Petitioner's request for release from indeterminate sex- offender parole as the remedy for failure to hold a timely duration review hearing as required by NMSA 1978, Section 31-21-10.1(C) (2007);
1
{2} WHEREAS, the Court ordered that this case be held in abeyance pending the Court's disposition of Aragon v. Martinez, S-1-SC-39172;
{3} WHEREAS, this Court has now issued an opinion and mandate in Aragon v. Martinez, ___-NMSC-___, ___ P.3d ___ (S-1-SC-39172, July 14, 2025) (mandate filed Aug. 18, 2025);
{4} WHEREAS, the opinion in Aragon addresses and significantly affects the issue of law presented in this case about the appropriate remedy for the failure to hold a timely duration review hearing;
{5} WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the other issues raised in the petition and concludes that they should be denied; and
{6} WHEREAS, the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) NMRA to dispose of this case by nonprecedential order rather than a formal opinion;
{7} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the abeyance is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the district court to reconsider Petitioner's right to habeas relief in accordance with Aragon, ___-NMSC-___, ¶ 42; and
{8} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other issues raised in the petition are
DENIED.
{9} IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice
WE CONCUR:
DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice C. SHANNON BACON, Justice JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice
2