Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Lucombe v. Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION NIGEL LUCOMBE, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:25-cv-2005-WFJ-SPF CYNTHIA JIMENEZ, DALTON WADE INC. and THE JIMENEZ GROUP, L.L.C., Defendants. /

O R D E R

The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement (Dkt. 19) that the

above-styled action has been settled as to Defendant Dalton Wade, Inc. Accordingly,

pursuant to Local Rule 3.09, M.D. Fla., it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within sixty (60) days of the date of this

order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or

for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 60-day

period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice as to Defendant Dalton Wade, Inc.

The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and to CLOSE the

file.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 1, 2025.

s/William F. Jung WILLIAM F. JUNG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record and Plaintiff, pro se

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Lucombe v. Jimenez
(Dec 1, 2025)