Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Whitman v. Unilever

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

NORTHERN DIVISION

VALERIA WHITMAN PLAINTIFF

V.

UNILEVER

No. 3:25-cv-119-DPM

DEFENDANT

ORDER

Unilever's motion to extend, Doc. 10, is granted for good cause.

It must respond to Whitman's amended complaint by 15 October 2025.

Unilever hasn't timely contacted Whitman because it doesn't have her

phone number or email address. The Court directs Whitman to give

that information to Unilever's lawyer by 8 October 2025.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Case 3:25-cv-00119-DPM Document 11 Filed 10/01/25 Page 1 of 1

    1. Superintendent of Documents
    2. 2025-10-03T12:46:07-0400
    3. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office
    5. Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Whitman v. Unilever
(Oct 1, 2025)