Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Benton v. Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- -x

-x

ORDER 25-CV-4807 (Donnelly, J.) (Marutollo, M.J.)

MELISSA BENTON,

Plaintiff,

v. ARAMARK,

Defendant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- JOSEPH A. MARUTOLLO, United States Magistrate Judge:

On August, 26 2025, pro se Plaintiff Melissa Benton filed a complaint against Defendant

Aramark (Dkt. No. 1) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2).

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses against Defendant, and the United States

Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons, complaint, and a copy of this Order upon

Defendant without prepayment of fees.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York SO ORDERED.

September 2, 2025

/s/ Joseph A. Marutollo JOSEPH A. MARUTOLLO United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:25-cv-04807-AMD-JAM Document 4 Filed 09/02/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>

    1. Superintendent of Documents
    2. 2025-09-03T18:16:44-0400
    3. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office
    5. Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Benton v. Aramark
(Sep 2, 2025)