ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Roc Nation's Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Plaintiff Should Not Be Ordered to Remove Social Media Postings and Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, ECF No. [113]; Defendant Desiree Perez's Motion for Special Order Regarding Social Media Postings and Violation of Court Order, ECF No. [125]; and certain Parties' Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Javon Hadley Should Not Be Ordered to Remove Social Media Postings and Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, ECF No. [138] (collectively, the
"Motions"). On July 18, 2025, the Motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis, ECF No. [164]. On July 31, 2025, Judge Louis held a hearing on the matter and the parties jointly agreed that the Court should enter their proposed order. On August 4, 2025, Judge Louis issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. [189], recommending that the Motions be denied as moot, and that the Court enter the Parties' proposed order.
1
"If a party fails to object to any portion of the magistrate judge's report, those portions are reviewed for clear error." Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The portions of the report and recommendation to which an objection is made are reviewed de novo only if those objections
"pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with." United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Nevertheless, the Court is fully advised in the premises of the R&R.1Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well reasoned and correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The R&R, ECF No. [189], is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Roc Nation's Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Plaintiff Should Not Be Ordered to Remove Social Media Postings and Not Be Held in Contempt of Court,
ECF No. [113], is DENIED AS MOOT.
3. Defendant Desiree Perez's Motion for Special Order Regarding Social Media Postings and Violation of Court Order, ECF No. [125], is DENIED AS MOOT.
2
4. The Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Javon Hadley Should Not Be Ordered to Remove Social Media Postings and Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, ECF No. [138], is DENIED AS MOOT.
5. Plaintiff Demoree Hadley must delete/remove the Repost from the X Platform. Because Demoree Hadley continues to report having technical difficulties in removing/deleting this Repost, Defendant Roc Nation and Demoree Hadley are DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to X Corp. and advise X Corp. to remove/delete the Repost (but not the underlying post) because the Repost is in violation of the Special Order.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on August 12, 2025. _________________________________
BETH BLOOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
Counsel of Record
3