Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Vankersen v. Commissioner of Socal Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HEIDI VANKERSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

________________________________/ Case No. 1:24-cv-909

HON. JANE M. BECKERING

ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is a civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties filed a Stipulation for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 13). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) on June 16, 2025, recommending that this Court approve the stipulation. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulation for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

1

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded EAJA fees in the amount of $8,447.70, subject to any offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes to the United States, and costs in the amount of $405.00.

Dated: July 1, 2025 /s/ Jane M. Beckering

JANE M. BECKERING

United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Vankersen v. Commissioner of Socal Security
(Jul 1, 2025)