Aspire Power Ventures, LP v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Thomas Gleeson, Lori Cobos, Jimmy Glotfelty, Kathleen Jackson, and Courtney Hjaltman

ACCEPTED

15-24-00118-CV

FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

~ ARRINGTON COLE4/M1/2A02N5 1 :29 PM

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Ken Carrol l CLERK Senior Counsel

FI 2 L 1 E 4 D . 8 IN 55.3029

15t k h c COURT OF APPEALS AaUr rSoTlIlN@, cTcEsXbA.Scom 4/1/2025 1:29:07 PM

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Clerk

April 1, 2025

Via E-File

Fifteenth Court of Appeals of Texas c/o Christopher A. Prine, Clerk

300 W. 15th Street, Suite 607 Austin, Texas 78701

Notice of Supplemental Authority, Tex. R. App. P. 38.7

Re: No. 15-24-00118-CV, Aspire Power Ventures, LP v. Public Utilities Commission of Texas, et al.

To the Honorable Court:

On March 28, 2025, after briefing closed in this appeal, the Supreme Court of Texas decided Kensington Title-Nevada, LLC v. Texas Dep't of State Health Services, No. 23-0644, 2025 WL 937478 (Tex. Mar. 28, 2025) (copy attached). Kensington addressed a district court's jurisdiction under Tex. Gov't Code § 2001.038 over a challenge to an agency rule that prohibits possession of radioactive material without a license. Id. at *1.

In Aspire's appeal pending before this Court, Appellees have argued, among other things, that Aspire's challenge to the validity of the ECRS Rules under Tex. Gov't Code § 2001.038 is barred because Aspire did not exhaust administrative remedies by first presenting its challenge to the PUC under PURA's "contested-case" procedures. ERCOT Br. at 44-47; PUC Br. at 22-26. Aspire disagreed, arguing that § 2001.038 expressly excuses a plaintiff from any requirement that it Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, L.L.P.

www.ccsb.com 901 Main Street, Suite 5500 • Dallas, Texas 75202 • fax: 214.580.2641

1

Fifteenth Court of Appeals of Texas April 1, 2025

Page 2

first exhaust potential administrative remedies before seeking relief in court. Aspire Br. at 59-60; Aspire Reply at 24-25. The Supreme Court in Kensington has now resolved that issue in Aspire's favor: "Section 2001.038(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act allows a plaintiff to seek a declaratory judgment regarding the validity or applicability of an administrative rule without [first] going through an agency proceeding." Kensington, 2025 WL 937478, at *1. The Court explained,

The Department, for its part, argues that the question whether Kensington "possessed" the radioactive material involves factual disputes that should be decided in an administrative proceeding followed by judicial review. Indeed, it points out that the issue was already litigated in Kensington's SOAH contested case proceeding and the ALJ found that Kensington had exercised control over the radioactive material. The court of appeals agreed, concluding that "the question of who possesses the radioactive personal property ... should be resolved in the context of an administrative contested-case hearing" so that the agency can "exercise its discretion and apply its expertise." [Tex. Dep't of State Health Svcs. v. Kensington Title- Nevada, LLC, 704 S.W.3d 16, 18 (Tex. App.—Austin 2023), rev'd, No. 23-0644, 2025 WL 937478 (Tex. Mar. 28, 2025).]

These efforts to invoke concepts of primary jurisdiction and exhaustion of administrative remedies are misplaced. As we have already explained, the statute expressly authorizes a

"court [to] render a declaratory judgment without regard to whether the plaintiff requested the state agency to rule on the validity or applicability of the rule in question." Tex. Gov't Code § 2001.038(d).

Kensington, 2025 WL 937478, at *6 (emphasis added). In sum, the Texas Supreme Court in Kensington rejected the very same "primary jurisdiction and exhaustion" arguments asserted here by ERCOT and the PUC Parties.

2

Fifteenth Court of Appeals of Texas April 1, 2025

Page 3

Respectfully submitted,

Chrysta L. Castañeda /s/ Ken Carroll Texas Bar No. 15325625 Monica Latin chrysta@castaneda-firm.com Texas Bar No. 00787881 Nicole Michael MLatin@ccsb.com

Texas Bar No. 24067767 Brent M. Rubin nicole@castaneda-firm.com Texas Bar No. 24086834 T HE CASTAÑEDA FIRM BRubin@ccsb.com

325 N. St. Paul, Suite 2030 Ken Carroll Dallas, Texas 75201 Texas Bar No. 03888500 Phone: (214) 282-8579 KCarroll@ccsb.com Fax: (214) 602-9187 C ARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 5500 Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone: (214) 855-3000 Fax: (214) 580-2641 Attorneys for Appellant Aspire Power Ventures, LP

3

Fifteenth Court of Appeals of Texas April 1, 2025

Page 4

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on the 1st day of April, 2025, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served via the authorized electronic filing system on counsel of record for Appellees:

John R. Hulme Elliot Clark

John.Hulme@oag.texas.gov eclark@winstead.com

Amanda Atkinson Cagle Elin Isenhower

Amanda.Cagle@oag.texas.gov eisenhower@winstead.com Jordan Pratt W INSTEAD PC

Jordan.Pratt@oag.texas.gov 600 W. 5th Street, Suite 900 Environmental Protection Division Austin, TX 78701 Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548, MC-066 Counsel for Appellee ERCOT Austin, TX 78711-2548

Counsel for Appellees the

Public Utilities Commission of

Texas and its Chairman and

Commissioners

/s/ Ken Carroll

Ken Carroll

4

WESTLAW

5

WESTLAW

6

WESTLAW

7

WESTLAW

8

WESTLAW

9

WESTLAW

10

WESTLAW

11

Footnotes

1 704 S.W.3d at 19-20; see also, e.g., LMV-AL Ventures, LLC v. Tex. Dep't of Aging & Disability Servs., 520 S.W.3d 113, 124-25 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, pet. denied); Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n v. D. Houston, Inc., No. 03-13-00327-CV, 2017 WL 2333272, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin May 25, 2017, pet. denied).

2 MODEL STATE ADMIN. PROC. ACT § 7 (UNIF. L. COMM'N 1961).

3 See ALA. CODE § 41-22-10; ARK. CODE § 25-15-207(a); CONN. GEN. STAT. § 4-175; IDAHO CODE § 67-5278(1); 5 ILL. COMP. STAT. 100/5-150; LA. STAT. §

WESTLAW

12

49:968(A)(1), (D); MICH. COMP. LAWS § 24.264; MONT. CODE § 2-4-506(a); NEV. REV. STAT. § 233B.110(1); N.H. REV. STAT. § 541-A:24; N.M. STAT. § 12-8-8(A); N.Y. A.P.A. LAW § 205; N.C. GEN. STAT. §§ 150B-4, 150B-43-45; OHIO REV. CODE § 199.12; OKLA. STAT. TIT. 75, § 306(A); 42 R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-35-7; S.C. CODE § 1-23-150; S.D. CODIFIED LAWS § 1-26-14; TENN. CODE§ 4-5-225; UTAH CODE § 63G-3-602; VT. STAT. TIT. 3, § 807.

4 We also note that the Fifteenth Court of Appeals will hear future appeals in Section 2001.038(a) declaratory judgment actions. See Act of May 21, 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., ch. 459, § 1.10, sec. 2001.038(f), 2023 Tex. Sess. Laws. That court is not bound by precedent of the Third Court of Appeals. See Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Amalgamated Transit Union Loc. No. 1338, 273 S.W.3d 659, 664-65 (Tex. 2008).

5 See also Pieter M. Schenkkan, When and How Should Texas Courts Review Agency Rules?, 47 BAYLOR L. REV. 989, 1036 (1995).

End of Document © 2025 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. WESTlAW

13

Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Ken Carroll on behalf of Ken Carroll

Bar No. 03888500

kcarroll@ccsb.com

Envelope ID: 99134822

Filing Code Description: Letter

Filing Description: Notice of Supplemental Authority Status as of 4/1/2025 1:38 PM CST

Associated Case Party: Aspire Power Ventures, LP

Associated Case Party: Public Utility Commission of Texas

Associated Case Party: Electric Reliability Council of Texas

14

Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Ken Carroll on behalf of Ken Carroll

Bar No. 03888500

kcarroll@ccsb.com

Envelope ID: 99134822

Filing Code Description: Letter

Filing Description: Notice of Supplemental Authority Status as of 4/1/2025 1:38 PM CST

Case Contacts

15