NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted November 20, 2024 [**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 2:16-cr-01377-ROS-2
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM [*]
Thintinus Noseth Taylor appeals from the district court's order revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence of imprisonment of 6 months and 2 days, to be followed by 24 months' supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Taylor's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Taylor the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Comments