UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Plaintiff, v. RANDY MARTELL BALLARD, Defendant.

JOHN D. EARLY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)]

JOHN D. EARLY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendant having been arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California fot alleged violations of the terms and conditions of supervision; and

The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), The Court finds that:

A. (X) The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on: nature of current allegations, including alleged commission of a felony offense, that is, possession of cocaine for sale, and a misdemeanor offense, that is, disorderly conduct, use of alcohol, being present in a place where alcohol is the, main item for sale, failure to report an arrest, use of cocaine, and unauthorized travel to Mexico; prior criminal history

and

B. (X) The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on: nature of current allegations, including alleged commission of a felony offense, that is, possession of cocaine tor sale, and a misdemeanor offense, that is, disi ydeny conduct, use of alcohol, being present in a pl, ice where alcohol is the main item for sale, failure to report an arrest, use o f cocaine, and unauthorized travel to Mexico; prior criminal history

IT THERE! ORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further revocation proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Ballard
(Dec 2, 2024)