Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

IN RE: LEAH J. DIPIPPO, LEAH J. DIPIPPO Applicant

LISA L. SADLER, JUDGE

Sent to S.C. Reporter 08/26/24

ORDER

LISA L. SADLER, JUDGE

{¶1} On May 7, 2024, a hearing was held in this matter before a Magistrate of this court. On May 21, 2024, the Magistrate issued a Decision wherein she found that Applicant failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she qualified as a victim of criminally injurious conduct as defined in R.C. 2743.51(C)(1). Therefore, the Magistrate recommended that the July 18, 2023 Final Decision of the Attorney General be affirmed.

{¶2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: "A party may file written objections to a magistrate's decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i)." No objections were filed.

{¶3} Upon review of the claim file, and the Magistrate's Decision, it is the Court's finding that the Magistrate was correct in her analysis of the issues and application of the law. Accordingly, this court adopts the Magistrate's Decision and recommendation as its own.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

{¶4} The May 21, 2024 Decision of the Magistrate is ADOPTED;

{¶5} The July 18, 2023 Final Decision of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED;

{¶6} This claim is DENIED and judgment entered for state of Ohio;

{¶7} Costs assumed by the reparations fund.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Dipippo
(Jun 6, 2024)