Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THERESA MARGARET MACDONALD, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA HAALAND Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants.

SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER RE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court at Docket 8 is what the Court liberally construes as Plaintiff MacDonald's Amended Complaint. The matter was referred to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Kyle F. Reardon. At Docket 9, Judge Reardon issued his Report and Recommendation, in which he recommended that this action be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). That statute provides that a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” A court is to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the magistrate judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”However, § 636(b)(1) does not “require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Id.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

The magistrate judge recommended that this action be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice and neither party has filed objections to that Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with its analysis. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. This action is DISMISSED without leave to amend and with prejudice.

2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MacDonald v. Haaland
(Aug 1, 2024)