Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MARK HICKLES, Plaintiff, v. KIRSTEN JOHNSON, et al. Defendants.

ANDREW R. WISEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

ANDREW R. WISEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff Mark Hickles, a patient at Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, Wisconsin, has filed a proposed civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging constitutional rights violations. Plaintiff requests leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

This court uses one method to determine the indigency status of all institutionalized persons, even those like plaintiff who are not subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This method requires plaintiff to submit a certified copy of a resident account statement for the entire six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

A certified copy of a resident account statement for the six-month period preceding the complaint must be provided if plaintiff intends to pursue a request to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. Because plaintiff's complaint was submitted on July 1, 2024, the account statement should cover the period beginning approximately January 1, 2024 and ending approximately July 1, 2024. If plaintiff fails to submit an account statement by July 23, 2024, then I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily.

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Mark Hickles may have until July 23, 2024 to submit a certified copy of a resident account statement for the period beginning approximately January 1, 2024 and ending approximately July 1, 2024. If plaintiff fails to respond to this order by July 23, 2024, then I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily. In that event, the case will be dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff refiling at a later date.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hickles v. Johnson
(Jun 2, 2024)