Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Tyrone Davis, also known as Tyrone D. Davis Defendant-Appellant

PER CURIAM.

Submitted: June 26, 2024

Unpublished

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Davis appeals after the district court denied his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 821. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). The court's Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction demonstrates that it was aware of and considered the relevant factors, including the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Rodd, 966 F.3d 740, 748 (8th Cir. 2020).

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Davis
(Jul 1, 2024)