PER CURIAM.
[Unpublished]
Submitted: March 27, 2024
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
Before Benton, Erickson, and Stras, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Russell Holliday appeals the district court's order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment for the defendants. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
The Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
This court has reviewed the record de novo as well as the parties' arguments on appeal and concludes that there is no basis for reversal. See Nieters v. Holtan, 83 F.4th 1099, 1105 (8th Cir. 2023) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity; for qualified immunity, facts must demonstrate constitutional or statutory deprivation when viewed in light most favorable to plaintiff).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.