Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TIMOTHY MCNEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. HUTCHINSON, Acting Warden; C. NEVILS; MR. GLENN; MS. LANHAM; MS. NECOMB; MR. TAYLOR; MS. JOHNSON; MS. V. MARTIN, Defendants - Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: March 21, 2024

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-03431-JFA)

Timothy McNeal, Appellant Pro Se.

Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer L. Mallory, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before THACKER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Timothy McNeal appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, and dismissing his complaint, which raised Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment claims against several prison employees under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See McNeal v. Hutchinson, No. 2:21-cv-03431-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 2, 2022). We further deny McNeal's motion for default. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McNeal v. Hutchinson
(Apr 1, 2024)