Smith v. Agdeppa

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 20-56254

Acts

—Title 28 APPENDIXFEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE — En Banc Determination

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased, Plaintjf-Appellee, v. EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, and CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants.

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05370-CAS-JC

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65, is DENIED.

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased, Plaintjf-Appellee, v. EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, and CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants.

Comments