AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. TERRY MICHAEL SVEJDA, and CENTURION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants.

Michael D. Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Michael D. Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge

This matter comes before the Court following a telephone conference held with counsel for the parties on February 1, 2024. Plaintiff requested the call to discuss its proposal regarding three of Plaintiff's trial witnesses that Defendants maintain were untimely disclosed: Amy Meyer, Kathleen Clapper, and Tanya Deininger. Defendants have filed a motion in limine seeking an order preventing those individuals from testifying at trial due to their alleged untimely disclosure and prejudice to Defendants. (Filing No. 151; Filing No. 152). Although Plaintiff disputes these witnesses were untimely disclosed, Plaintiff suggests that to cure any prejudice by the alleged untimely disclosure, the Court could reopen discovery for the limited purpose of providing Defendants with the opportunity to depose the three witnesses now that the trial has been continued to April 1, 2024. Plaintiff does not seek to depose these witnesses, and only intends to call them to testify at trial.

Plaintiff notes that if it is permitted to call Ms. Clapper as a witness at trial, it would not need to call Ms. Meyer.

Defendants oppose Plaintiff's proposal, dispute Plaintiff's counsel's characterization of the facts, and objects to the undersigned magistrate judge's ruling on this issue, as the propriety of these witnesses' trial testimony is pending before Senior Judge Gerrard in Defendants' Motion in Limine (Filing No. 151). As stated on the record during the hearing, the undersigned magistrate judge provided Defendants with the choice to depose these three individuals by March 1, 2024, or to stand on their objections and arguments in their motion in limine. The cost of the depositions would be borne by Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Svejda
(Feb 1, 2024)