AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

FLAGSTAR BANK FSB. Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL C. HILD, et al. Defendants.

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (ECF No. 72) AND (2) IMPOSING TEMPORAL LIMIT ON DISCOVERY

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 28, 2023, the Court held an on-the-record status conference with counsel for all parties. During that conference, the Court heard argument on Plaintiff Michael C. Hild's motion to stay proceedings. (See Mot., ECF No. 72.) For the reasons explained during the status conference, the motion is DENIED. As further discussed on the record, during the first sixty (60) days of fact discovery, the only discovery that Plaintiff Flagstar Bank FSB may direct to Hild are requests for the production of documents. It may not seek any other discovery from Hild during that time period. At the expiration of the sixty-day time period, Flagstar may conduct full discovery from Hild.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on August 1, 2023, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

Holly A. Ryan Case Manager

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Flagstar Bank FSB v. Hild
(Aug 1, 2023)