Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

SERGIO MORALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MINEV, et al. Defendants.

ELAYNA J. YOTUCHAW UNITE© STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOTUCHAW UNITE© STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 41) in which Plaintiff states concerns about conducting discovery while he waits for pro bono counsel to be appointed. On July 3, 2023, Defendants filed a non-opposition to the Court's proposal that discovery and other due dates in the Scheduling Order be stayed until such time as pro bono counsel is appointed. ECF No. 44.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that dates appearing in the Scheduling Order for Civil Rights Action Filed by Incarcerated Pro Se Plaintiff (ECF No. 28) that have not already passed are stayed until such time as pro bono counsel enters an appearance for Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of pro bono counsel entering an appearance, counsel for the parties must meet and confer regarding a revised discovery plan and scheduling order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint proposed revised discovery plan and scheduling order must be filed with the Court no later than ten (10) days after the parties meet and confer.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Morales v. Minev
(Jul 3, 2023)